In this case we have a lot of threads and along each thread there is an implicit order (the execution of the UD), but there is no inherent relative order of the threads.

Brent


On 9/15/2016 9:15 AM, Stephen Paul King wrote:
There is "time is a measure of change" concept, which lines up with what you're saying: "...'time' is only a real number..." The numbers are labels, not the change itself.

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Brent Meeker <meeke...@verizon.net <mailto:meeke...@verizon.net>> wrote:



    On 9/15/2016 12:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:

    On 14 Sep 2016, at 02:13, Brent Meeker wrote:



    On 9/13/2016 7:22 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:


    On Sunday, 11 September 2016, Brent Meeker
    <meeke...@verizon.net> wrote:

        In the UD model of the world, time as we perceive it, is
        emergent.  The "execution" of the program is timeless and
        exists in Platonia.  So the steps of the UD have no
        duration, they are logically prior to time and duration. On
        the other hand, I think so called "observer moments" must
        have duration in the emergent sense and must overlap. But
        their relation to the UD threads is more aspirational than
        proven.

    I think it should be possible to pause and restart at any point
    a process underpinning consciousness and leave the stream of
    consciousness unchanged; otherwise there would be a radical
    decoupling of the mental from the physical. At the limit, this
    means the process underpinning consciousness can be cut up into
    infinitesimals.

Infinitesimals, I think not, at least not in Bruno's model. Each thread of the UD's computation can be cut and restarted,
    but underlying an "observer moment" or a "thought" are
    infinitely many threads and there is no reference by which you
    can define cutting them all at "the same time".  So they make
    the "time" of consciousness essentially real valued.

    Good point.

    But that is where the "infinitesimal" comes in, I would say, be
    them in terms of Cauchy sequences or in term of Non Standard
    analysis, that's not important at this stage. It depends on the
    mathematics of the arithmetical measure on 1p experiences (we get
    them trough the math of self-reference, but are still a long way
    from an arithmetical Gleason theorem).

    Bruno

    PS wrote this mail yesterday, seems to not have gone through.
    Sorry if sent in double exemplars.

    But the 'time' is only a real number if you can order the events
    in the different threads relative to one another.  In the
    materialist theory of mind that is provided by physical time, the
    evolution parameter of the wave function.  I think that means that
    in your theory you have to derive time in order to locate
    'thoughts' or 'observer moments'; they are no givens that you can
    assume.

    Brent
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in
    the Google Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
    https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe
    <https://groups.google.com/d/topic/everything-list/FnHZFBf-Acw/unsubscribe>.
    To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email
    to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
    To post to this group, send email to
    everything-list@googlegroups.com
    <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
    Visit this group at
    https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
    <https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list>.
    For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
    <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.




--

Kindest Regards,

Stephen Paul King

Senior Researcher

Mobile: (864) 567-3099

stephe...@provensecure.com <mailto:stephe...@provensecure.com>

http://www.provensecure.us/

“This message (including any attachments) is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is non-public, proprietary, privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law or may be constituted as attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, notify sender immediately and delete this message immediately.”

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <mailto:everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com <mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/everything-list.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to