On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 8:43 PM John Clark <johnkcl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 2:51 AM Alan Grayson <agrayson2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > *Why don't you just accept that the wf is simply irrelevant after the >> measurement occurs* >> > > Because you can't explain exactly what is and what is not a "measurement". > And because tacking on complicated mathematical wheels within wheels to > make the wave function suddenly vanish would not improve the theories > ability to make observable predictions by one bit and would do absolutely > nothing except muzzle the Schrödinger Equation which is virtually shouting > at us about the nature of reality. The Many Worlds theory didn't tack on > all those many worlds, if you take a bare bones approach to quantum > mechanics and add nothing not needed to explain observation those worlds > come naturally, they can't be avoided. > So why do all Everettians have to add so many additional assumptions in order to pretend to get out the Born rule? Bruce -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAFxXSLQ%3DxXCvOrY_cBiXeo3otcuHVNd6H83ZDSnkDsL5-C7gLA%40mail.gmail.com.
