On Monday, November 4, 2024 at 2:37:52 PM UTC-7 John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 4, 2024 at 4:25 PM Alan Grayson <[email protected]> wrote: *> "It" refers to Schrodinger's equation, which is known to describe NON-RELATIVISTIC QM,* *Please give me a specific example of what you're talking about * *It's ALWAYS presented as NON-RELATIVISTIC. I'm surprised you are unaware of this. AG * *> since the wf solutions extend to plus and minus infinity, even solutions to the relativistic equation of Dirac. AG* *And the observable problems that produces are ......? * *I suppose that when the velocity of a particle is comparable to the SoL, the result of Schrodinger's equation will differ substantially from those of the Dirac equation, but offhand I can't offer a specific example. AG * *> Moreover, QM is inherently NON-LOCAL* *Charles Darwin! I'm not going to go over all that yet AGAIN! Enough is enough. * *You don't have to, and I am not expecting you to. But I'd sure appreciate it if you would not lapse into your a'hole mode. But you're wrong. QM is non-local. How the hell do you think the wf can extend to infinity in both directions. Something must be moving instantaneously! AG *e1e -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/efa4afd6-d98a-429e-9b68-a36e2a4a8a92n%40googlegroups.com.
