On 2/19/2025 11:16 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:


Le jeu. 20 févr. 2025, 07:55, Brent Meeker <[email protected]> a écrit :

    What does it mean to have more than one observer in a branch?  A
    branch forms because the result is orthogonal to the other
    different results.  Of course any number of persons can observe
    it, which by construction means they are in that branch.  Is that
    what you mean?

    Brent


Brent,

A branch isn't a single discrete entity—it's a region in the wavefunction where decoherence prevents interference. The distinction matters because if the wavefunction remains a superposition of infinite components, then what we call a "branch" is just an approximate partition, not a fundamental unit.
But it has only one result...right?  That's what makes it a branch and not two branches.

Saying "one observer per branch" assumes a sharp branching structure, but if the wavefunction maintains an underlying continuous structure, then what we experience as "branches" are really clusters of high-measure observer instances. More than one observer in a branch means that, within that region of the wavefunction, there are exponentially more instances of an observer experiencing a high-amplitude outcome than a low-amplitude one.

In other words, observer count isn't tied to branch count—it's tied to measure.
Which is the number of observers, each of which is in a branch orthogonal to all other branches...right?

Brent

What matters isn’t how many "branches" exist but how many copies of an observer exist in each, which is why most observers see outcomes aligning with the Born rule.

Quentin


    On 2/19/2025 10:48 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
    If you assume one observer per branch, you assume what you want
    to prove: that measure plays no role.

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
    Groups "Everything List" group.
    To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
    send an email to [email protected].
    To view this discussion visit
    
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc277de3-baaa-4029-b71e-a4115d76e3fc%40gmail.com
    
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/fc277de3-baaa-4029-b71e-a4115d76e3fc%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAo6crOnadBmhkHBm0F67Y%3D%2Be25%2BmNOXodPtOwjxXPmXsg%40mail.gmail.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/CAMW2kAo6crOnadBmhkHBm0F67Y%3D%2Be25%2BmNOXodPtOwjxXPmXsg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/016cc873-002c-4f6b-a0d1-07dab24517be%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to