Sites with buildings as a boundary? Generally, no that wouldn't be a best bet. Unless the building happen to be on separate continents.
Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -----Original Message----- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:29 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: clustering wireless > > > So the best bet would get another server in the other > building with a new site to cut down on the existing server > load. And of course move over some one companys mailboxes > because there is two companys on one server right now. And > get a phat tape drive to backup up my DB. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Seitz, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 10:14 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: clustering wireless > > > Trust us on this one, clustering won't buy you a thing. I > inherited a clustered exchange server here at work and Kevin > is right, when the Db is corrupt, > you're toast. Simple as that. Stick with Raid level > redundancy, backups, and a recovery server. > > Peter Seitz > Operating Systems Analyst > Cubic Corporation > San Diego, Ca. 92021 > (858) 505-2724 > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 6:35 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: clustering wireless > > > Hello, > > Has anyone ever set MCSC between two building over a > wireless bridge. I was wondering if it is possible to > cluster two exchange servers over a Cisco Aironet 340. > > Thanks > Richard _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
