The samples are not large enough to draw a scientific conclusion but in terms of incidence rates (events per drive per unit time) Maxtor seem to be the lowest.
It would be neat to gather enough samples to make a good scientific judgement. Jim Tarvid On Wednesday 02 October 2002 08:43 am, J. Grant wrote: > June-Jerry Kreps wrote: > On Tuesday 01 October 2002 05:51 am, J. Grant wrote: > > Is there any infomation on drives/manufactors that work well with linux > then? If WD are that bad I'm stuffed, i just bought a new drive from them. > > JG > > > I have two WD drives, 30 GB each, and they work great. > JLK > > luckily for me my WD drive was ranked 2nd in this review. Realy you need > a huge test set to get consistent results though > > http://www.hardwareanalysis.com/content/article/1540/ > > JG
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
