I wish you people would quit cluttering my mailbox with all this crap. There are other 
lists where this would be appropriate.

"Franki" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote ..
> first of all... repeat after me.  "FRANKI IS NOT AN AMERICAN"  :-)
> 
> I'm an Aussie...
> 
> Second.. the US must be spending what ?? 5-10 millian a day at the very
> least, probably a good deal more, putting all that military might around
> iraq... and its been going on for a very long time...
> 
> That sort of money would take along time to get recompensed by iraq oil,
> particularly since the US would still have to pay for it anyway, and would
> have no direct control over it... as with Kuwait....
> 
> Yes... presidents have looked the other way many times in the past.. maybe
> its time to stop that???
> 
> Tibet is a good example to me is Tibet.. the chinese have all but totally
> crushed the wonderous culture of that country.. but in the 50's no one
> lifted a damn finger to stop them.. and thats not just the US.. thats
> everybody..
> 
> History is full of that as well.. maybe its time to stick up for the
> underdogs and try and make the whole world a democracy in some form or
> another....
> 
> I actually agree with the observation made earlier that Germany has a much
> more business like government then most other countries.. and I agree that
> from an economical perspective,, thats a really good thing..  from a
> military perspective, its a bad thing, because the people that don't know
> all the facts, can overrule the ones that do..
> 
> but overall I wish australia was run the same way... in Australia, our
> politicial parties spend all their time attacking each others policies
> instead of promoting the merits of their own policies ..
> 
> If I had two wishes for the perfect democracy.. I would ask that a law
> be
> put in place where political parties MUST NOT attack their opposition at
> ever step and must instead promote the benefits of their own party and
> policies instead of relying on attaching everyone elses..
> The other wish would be that issues of a military nature should be discussed
> by a commitee of the smartest people in the country, not the most popular..
> intellegence and knowledge should be the prerequsite to being on that
> commitee... The very smartest minds in the country... regardless of their
> industry or occupation.
> 
> And that commitee should have the ability to veto the head of state in
> issues of a military nature, and must have the ability to propose and act
> on
> actions decided upon by the commitee..
> 
> That way, the best minds are the ones making the important decisions, not
> politicians..
> 
> rgds
> 
> Franki
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alfredo C. López
> Sent: Thursday, 30 January 2003 12:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
> 
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I'm a guy living in Argentina, far away from the bullets.
> 
> El Mié 29 Ene 2003 10:23, Franki escribió:
> > You didn't address the issue of what to do about saddam without
> fighting...
> > (assuming he is guilty.)
> >
> > what are the alternatives.???
> 
> There are always alternatives..... May be leave the iraquies alone....
> Like a lot of US presidents did with Latin American in the past.
> It's known that in the past there were here a lot of Military presidents
> that
> didn't respect human rights and the us presidents never took action against
> them.
> More to say.... in Chile with President Alende... US was involve in the
> killing of Alende trough this guy called Kissinger. And it was a president
> voted by the people. And US supported the military president that come
> after
> that. Almost the same happend here in Argentina and Brasil.
> So... Please excuse me if I dont believe in your president. I don't trust
> anymore in a president that have to hide "evidence" in the behave of the
> people. Here in Argentina we suffer the doctrine of "national security"
> (of
> course... with the support of the US).
> So... to me.... the only explanation to the action taken by Bush
> administration is about oil and money. Nothing else..... there no comunist
> to
> fight this time.
> 
> 
> >
> > I am not saying i believe or disbelieve, I am saying that we don't know
> > enough as civilians to make the distinction...
> 
> That is very sad to hear. And coming from an american, is very
> disappointing.
> I think that the civilians need to know.... so they can control what rule
> you.
> My two cents.....
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > rgds
> >
> > Franki
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Wolfgang Bornath
> > Sent: Wednesday, 29 January 2003 8:59 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [expert] OT Will there be a tomorrow?
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 20:15 +0800, Franki wrote:
> > > Once hitler was in charge.. there was nothing even remotely like
> > > democracy...
> > > anyone that disagreed with him was locked up or killed.. many his own
> > > generals were terrified of him.. and most of the general german army
> had
> >
> > no
> >
> > > real idea what was going on or why they were fighting..
> > > That doesn't sound much like what is going on in the US at the moment..
> >
> > You are right with this. I did not compare the situation in the USA of
> > today with the situation in Germany in the 30ies. I just compared Mr.
> > Bush's speech with the speeches of Hitler and Goering in 1939.
> >
> > > everyone keeps saying "War is not the way"
> >
> > Correct. "War is commencing policy by different means." This quote
> > (can't remember who said that) doesn't apply any more in modern times.
> > Back when this quote was made war took place in the field.
> >
> > There were soldiers whose profession it was to go to war. They were
> > called "warriors". Was the girl killed in 9/11 or the man in the
> > streets of Oklahoma or the tourist in Djerba or on Bali, were they
> > warriors? NO.
> >
> > War has changed to something NOBODY can controll any more. All those
> > brave soldiers with their fine toys and their "Yes, Sir - No, Sir!"
> > mentality, they are just a part of war. If Saddam has to fight a
> > military action of the USA we all will be not warriors but potential
> > victims of that war. No matter how military actions proceed in Iraq,
> > there will always be enough terrorists ready to "revenge" whatever
> > they claim to be to revenge.
> >
> > > I'd like someone to give us an alternative for getting rid of saddam..
> >
> > does
> >
> > > anyone have one?
> > > Sanctions didn't work against him... just starved his people and made
> the
> > > west look like assholes (because saddam tells the people that the west
> > > are the reason they are starving).
> > >
> > > He has been doing the same stuff since 91 and none of the UN stuff
> has
> > > worked worth a damn..
> > >
> > > So what is this "alternative" so many speak of?? bribe him to leave??
> > > assasinate him?? what?? lets hear the alternatives.
> > > One last thing, If there is nothing to what the US has been saying...
> > > then the UN would not be putting the pressure on iraq that they are
> > > now... so there must be something to it...
> >
> > The UN - looks like USA regards themselves not a member any more. All
> > I hear is "We want this and UN wants that!". The community of world's
> > people - nothing else is the UN! - has a board of directors if you may
> > say so, it has no CEO! Maybe Mr. Bush does not know this...
> >
> > The UN does what the people want from them - they put pressure on
> > Saddam to find out what's going on to then decide for action. The UN
> > is not shy to start military actions - read the resolutions of former
> > conflicts.
> >
> > > Also, if the US do know stuff we don't.. its possible they can't say
> >
> > because
> >
> > > they have probably been trying to put spy's over there since 91.. if
> it
> > > comes to a choise between revealing all, getting their spy's killed
> and
> > > losing their data... what would you do???
> >
> > There is a point where all this has come into the open. There was a
> > long time now that Mr. Bush states that the US have evidence. Time
> > enough to clear out and cut all strings which could endanger someone
> > who is involved in gathering this evidence.
> >
> > Furthermore there is noone demanding to see the evidence in public. No
> > need to show them on CNN.
> >
> > There is always the option to show the evidence just to the members of
> > the Security Council and there's no reason to distrust those people
> > more than the average CIA guy. If those guys of the SC tell the world:
> > "OK, we have seen proof that Saddam has those weapons. We'll sign a
> > resolution to fight him." Then my little world is in order again. I'd
> > still be scared shitless, though. I'm also living in a city and work
> > in an institution and building which is on the top list of potential
> > targets (Frankfurt, Germany, German Federal Bank).
> >
> > > To put it simply, we MUSTN'T judge Bush, because we have no idea what
> he
> > > knows.. and what he doesn't. its possible that if you knew what he
> did,
> >
> > you
> >
> > > would be campaining for war also. Thats not to say that I agree with
> him,
> >
> > I
> >
> > > am simply not in a position to judge..
> >
> > As long as Mr. Bush is the leader of a nation which is a part of a
> > community he has to obide by the rules. In this serious issue there is
> > no "Trust me, I know what I'm doing."
> >
> > wobo
> 
> --
> =================================================================
>  Lic. Alfredo Carlos López
>  INIFTA - UNLP                           Phone: +54-221-425 7430
>  Instituto de Investigaciones            Fax: +54-221-425 4642
>  Fisicoquímicas Teórica y Aplicada.
>  Suc. 4 C.C. 16
>  1900 La Plata, Argentina
> 
>  Calle 68 nro.74 (e118/119) Dto. 15    Phone: +54-221-423 6240
>  1900 La Plata, Argentina         Cell-Phone: +54-221-(15) 455 0141
> =================================================================
> "One of the symptoms of an approaching nervous breakdown
>  is the belief that one's work is terribly important."
>                            - Bertrand Russell (1872-1970)
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? 
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Reply via email to