On Sunday 21 Sep 2003 3:38 pm, Eric Huff wrote: > > > > > > Would a link to one of the many copies of RFC 1855 such > > > > > > as this one be relevant here? It could be quoted as a > > > > > > more thorough authority. > > > > > > > > > > > > HTML > > > > > > http://www.dtcc.edu/cs/rfc1855.html#3 > > > > > > > > Not to be a spoil sport but isn't this a bit much? 6 or 7 > > > > points and requests from my peers is sufficient to guide me. > > > > I'm in two minds. Personally I prefer the informal, but there > > are those who only defer to authority. I don't mind either way. > > Give it today to get some opinions, then I'll go with the > > majority. > > I personally also prefer the informal. > > But, if someone reads our entire list and gets to a link at the > bottom, they can, if interested, look into it more. We could > expand the "The 'rules' of internet usage..." line to emphasize > "If you are interested...". > > I don't feel strongly either way, so i'll also just side with the > majority (which, of course, doesn't help in creating a majority :). > > eric
I think if I were reading it for the first time, I would think 'OK - that's what they want.' Then when I got to the bottom, I would probably say 'I'll have a look at that sometime' - and I'd probably forget about it. But it's there if anyone does want/need it. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302 Have you visited http://twiki.mdklinuxfaq.org yet?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
