Anne Wilson said: > On Friday 03 Oct 2003 4:19 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> James Sparenberg said: >> > Good news may be with samba 3.x .... it's better aimed at XP >> > (fingers >> > crossed) >> >> You know, I was reading a little bit about that, and I was under >> the impression that most of it's new features were aimed at >> dealing better with NT4. > > Since XP has the same base as NT4, that's reasonable.
I'm not a real m$ kernel guru, but I believe that they've made quite a few changes since nt4. Looking back on the win2k mcse classes, there was quite a bit of difference even in those systems. Working experience with xp now seems quite a bit different than 2k (of course that's end user stuff). > >>I thought that was quite odd, but I may >> have just misread; it was really more of a quick glance. >> Similarly with Win4lin; why do they keep putting out new >> versions >> that only work with 9x versions of Windoze? That system is 5 >> years old now. >> > The latest issue is able to support W2K upwards - but it's a first > stage, so I don't know how good it is yet. I'm sure that by the > next > release it will be good. > > And then of course many of us do actually prefer to stay with > win98 - > particularly since it is 100% stable under win4lin. Just browsing their webpage, they don't seem to have support for anything buy 95,98 or ME. Are you talking about one in beta? -- Michael Holt Snohomish, WA (o_ [EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_ (o_ //\ www.holt-tech.net (/)_ (/)_ V_/_ www.mandrake.com ============================================================< A cynic is a person searching for an honest man, with a stolen lantern. -- Edgar A. Shoaff
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com