---The Mahareeshee was by No means a sexual deviate!. He simply had normal sexual relationships, (encounters) with various females. What's wrong with that?
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > biosoundbill wrote: > > Richard are you saying that the TM mantras are > > not Tantric Bija Mantras? > > > Bill - The so-called TM bija mantras are just common > everyday words from the Sanskrit dictionary. They can > be found in almost any standard Sanskrit lexicon. For > example, Ram, Sri, Nama...nothing esoteric. > > In contrast, Buddhist Tantric bijas are all esoteric - > sounds that have no semantic meaning. Marshy is not > a Tantric Yogi, therefore he would be knowing nothing > about any esoteric bijas. He may or may not have been > instructed in Sri Vidya by his guru, and Marshy may or > may not have read Shankara's Saundarylahari. > > However, there are no bija mantras to be found in the > Rig Veda, the scriptures extolled by the Marshy. If he > were to impart any esoteric bija mantras, where whould > he have gotten them? If he read them in books, that > would be a travesty for him to pass them on - you can > get real bija mantras only in an initiation from a > tantric guru. > > There are no bija mantras in Patanjalis Yoga Sutras or > in any of the standard Upanishads. > > That is unless you are suggesting that Marshy was a > Tantric Guru - if so, why do you suppose he hasn't > shared any of his insights into sexual yoga, and why > would he keep all the sex enjoyment techniques to himself? > > We already know that the Marshy was a sexual deviate - > but now you're suggesting that he passed out tantric > bija mantras that he read about in a book, without > having been an authentic tantric initiate? > > What's up with that? >
