--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dear Off_World, whoever you are, i think it is a brilliant position > you take and try to entrench. I am with you on that. But, where is > its virtue if it is not coupled with social progress? It is like you > thrust with "peer review science" and then unable to stand up along > with the argument you run the other way taking its conclusions with > you. You could have been an ayatollah in the larger TM-jihad along > with the likes of Jon Hagelin but you drop the banner? What are you > afraid of in your thinking? That Rick or Alex might reveal your > identity here and that you would get banned from the Dome? > > I am intriqued with your seeming virtue, whoever you are. Your > seeming principle & cool humility. Just on the brink as you deploy > it, you then spurn TM-jihad by declining to lead it further. It is > laid in your lap and you declined it. You could have been an > Ayatollah. A spiritual leader of jihad. A "Captain", a leader of > citizen Meditators for the Age of Enlightenment.
Not to *mention* having 72 virgins waiting for you in Bramhaloka if you get snuffed in the process of leading the TM-jihad. And the brilliant part of this, from the TMO point of view, is that they only need a *total* of 72 virgins. The TM-jihad martyrs die and go to Brahmaloka, and after they get there the 72 virgins *remain* virgins, because these dickless wonders can't think of anything to do with them except have them wash their robes and polish their crowns. :-)
