--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Tom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Ah, Curtis, I'm not gay but reading your posts is giving me a man 
crush. <just kiddin>  
> bahahaha



Wait until he plays his mouth harp for you...he'll have you weak at 
the knees...




> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" 
<curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> >
> > <My gut feeling is that if you describe MMY's behavior in detail 
to a
> > number of psychologist and psychiatrists, they will guess that he 
had
> > a personality disorder.>
> > 
> > So you don't think they would just join him in his self 
perception as
> > being the most important human being in history?  What if they 
heard
> > Bevan telling them that he really really was, many many many many 
many
> > many many times?  How about then?  Still no?  This is going to be
> > harder than I thought...
> > 
> > This is the most troubling aspect of the cute little holy man 
picture
> > of Maharishi, his extreme version of grandiosity.  And it is also
> > where the devotion of his followers cross over into a darker 
place of
> > enabling a person with a real psychological problem. A person who
> > might have needed help instead of a steady stream of ass kissing.
> > 
> > Unless of course you want to give his own self perception another
> > shot?  You know, the perspective where EVERY other meditation 
teacher
> > and spiritual leader was his inferior. Where he was uniqually 
saddled
> > with the responsibility to spiritually regenerate all of mankind
> > alone, and only he among ALL the spiritual representatives of the
> > Vedic tradition in India knew the SPECIAL SECRETS.  
> > 
> > The ONLY authentic spiritual teacher, or at least the best of them
> > ALL. The TOPPERMOST of the POPPERMOST, a wonder unto himself AMEN 
and
> > Hallelujah!  Words cannot express how great and important he was, 
yet
> > his minions try...
> > 
> > And people wonder why I need the DSM-IV?  It is to keep me 
somewhat
> > sympathetic to his condition instead of ... being less 
sympathetic,
> > let's just leave it at. 
> > 
> > 
> >
>


Reply via email to