Bull's eye again, Mr. Archer, in my humble opinion.

--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of curtisdeltablues
> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2008 10:40 AM
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Witnessing, was: Steve
> Martin of Wilmington
> 
>  
> 
> > It was as though I were in deep meditation
> throughout the whole dynamic,
> > noisy experience. Not withdrawn or passive in the
> least – just
> > imperturbable. 
> 
> I'm glad you weighed in Rick. 
> 
> Sorry I don’t have time to follow the discussion
> more closely.
> 
> >I think your example illustrates that
> the usefulness of these states is context dependent.
> In a situation
> like you mentioned, a detached silence is a real
> asset. But I believe
> that this state is not useful for making love. 
> 
> Our difference is that you regard these states as
> relative perspectives,
> whereas I regard them as openings to universal
> realities. That makes sense,
> since you doubt the existence of subtler realities.
> You also imply in your
> last sentence above that “higher” states make one
> emotionally numb. I think
> there is evidence for that in the TMO, but there is
> also evidence throughout
> the larger spiritual community that greater
> emotional richness accompanies
> development of consciousness. I don’t know much
> about tantra, but I gather
> that tantrics regard the ability to maintain inner
> silence as a great aid to
> love making.
> 
> Neuro-linquistic
> programming (NLP) looks at these different states in
> relationship to
> the usefulness in a specific context. Their goal is
> to be able to
> shift fluidly between the options. I think they are
> related to the
> states produced by meditation. Where I differ with
> traditional yogic
> theory is that they seem to feel that you can't have
> too much silence
> along with activity. I think you can depending on
> what you are doing.
> 
> I agree with you, but I think that “too much” would
> only be a temporary
> state, due to inadequate integration. Also, the
> people I know who seem to be
> speaking from experience say that the whole
> witnessing/silence thing is a
> stage, and that silence is eventually perceived to
> be full of dynamism. I’m
> a little out of my league discussing this, but the
> point I’m trying to make
> is that there may be some undesirable aspects to
> certain stages in the
> development of consciousness, but these stages are
> transitional, and as one
> moves on, the undesirable aspects drop off and one
> is grateful to have
> persisted in the journey.
> 
> 
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
> Version: 7.5.516 / Virus Database: 269.21.1/1298 -
> Release Date: 2/25/2008
> 8:45 PM
>  
> 


Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 

Reply via email to