--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote: > > > > > > On Apr 5, 2008, at 11:57 AM, authfriend wrote: > > > > >> So you are not a Sidha Lawson? > > > > > > He is a Sidha. He's talking about plain-vanilla TM > > > above. > > > > So you clipped off the other questions satvadude asked, Judy? > > Presumably they weren't convenient ones, even though you know the > > answers. So here they > > are again: > > > > So you are not a Sidha Lawson? Why? Such a strong > > proponent of the teachings but never taken the > > sidhis? Why? Is it true what I have read here that > > you are not regular in your meditations? Why? > > About 10 years ago my nervous system was extremely damaged and all my problems I > had more or less under control were exacerbated beyond my ability to cope. TM and the > TM-sidhis, which I used to practice quite religiously,, became quite irregular. I'm recoverig > at least somewhat, so I'm starting to practice at least once a day agin, sometimes even > twice. > > > Lawson > my two cents: you ought to lay off the Sidhis until your nervous system feels completely healed- just stick with 2x a day TM at regular times.
The Sidhis strongly purify channels in your nervous system, and you don't want to subject those channels to such strong energy before they are healed and strengthened more gently with TM. And as always feel free to disregard this completely if when you go with your gut, it turns out to be a different choice.