> > So, you can't define 'enlightenment' or 'God'. 
> >
> I could give you many different versions of either 
> belief from some of the various sources who hold 
> such beliefs.
>
So, why not do so? Instead of making fun of poor 
religious people, victims of an earthquake and a 
cyclone? Why is it that you TM teachers are so
ignorant and crass?

> What does that have to do with anything?
> 
That 'God is a wuss' is the subject of this thread?

> > That's nothing to be ashamed of Curtis, so why 
> > not just admit it, instead of making fun of poor 
> > religious people?
> 
> Are they poor Richard?
>
You're pathetic, Curtis.

[snip]

Reply via email to