--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "R.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (snip) > > > Obama's effort to pay Hillary's campaign debts might not be > > > enough to please Hillary. He should hold those funds as > > > leverage to insure cooperation. > > > > He doesn't need any leverage. She wants to see a > > Democrat in the White House whether he helps pay > > her debts or not. > (snip) > Why should anyone but Hillary be responsible for her debts.
It's traditional that primary winners help the losers retire their campaign debt. This isn't a new wrinkle. <snip> > Obama is a better speaker, more intelligent, more universal > leader for the United States and the World. I'll give him better speaker. > Hillary will do alright; > I wouldn't worry about her finances too much. > Why would you? Where exactly did I say I was worried about her finances?
