--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "R.G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > (snip) > > > Concerning giving the Clinton's more money... > > Is there anyone else in any campaign that offered to pay of > a rivals debt.
Yes, it happens often (but only in primary campaigns, as far as I'm aware). > Having gotten into debt in itself, shows irresponsiblity, > and arrogance. No, it doesn't. Many major campaigns end up in debt. If you want to win, you have to spend money, and it's not always possible to collect enough of it in advance of when you need to spend it. <snip> > I wonder if the shoe were on the other foot... > and Barack had debts to pay... > I'm sure the Clinton's would be running to the bank to > withdraw money, so they could give it to Barack? > I don't think so... You're right, because that's not how it works. The winner doesn't give the loser his/her own money, nor even his/her campaign funds. Rather, s/he asks his/her maxed-out donors to donate to the loser's campaign debt. And yes, if Hillary had won, *of course* she would do that for Obama. But it wouldn't be just out of the goodness of her heart, any more than it is for Obama to help Hillary with her debt. First of all, the loser is expected to ask his/her supporters to donate to the winner; that's a major source of campaign funds for the winner. Second, it's in the winner's interests to look like a good guy to the loser's supporters (especially when, as in this case, there's a very substantial number of them, without most of whom Obama can't win the general). In a very hard-fought primary campaign like this one, it's in the winner's interests to do whatever s/he can to unify the party and get it behind him/ her, otherwise s/he's likely to lose in the general. Even Obama is down with this: NY Times, May 9: Mr. Obama suggested today that there would be some precedent for helping erase her debt. "I think historically after a campaign is done and you want to unify the party particularly when you've had a strong opponent," Mr. Obama said, "you want to make sure that you're putting that opponent in a strong position so that they can work to win an election in November." http://tinyurl.com/4thjw3