I think this is a great idea and people's objections can be worked into the test. If someone has a problem with Turq's credibility then let's add some more people with medical and birth date examples. The medical details can be emailed in advance to someone we all vote that we trust, or better yet two people who get different names. I think we need 4 people's charts.
We just need someone who could be trusted not to skew the test. I am too biased for such job but someone like Marek isn't. Of course the person doing the Joitish is doing the heavy lifting, but I hope this would be interesting enough for them too. I mean even without this being a scientifically valid test it is very interesting. I am biased against believing that humans know this kind of stuff. I would love to have a few examples blow my mind in such a test. It would certainly lead to me looking into it further. Even working out the protocol for such a test would be fun IMO. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_re...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > Namaste, > > > > Your friend was born under the sign of Leo according to jyotish > > rules, and the Moon is under the asterism or nakshatra of Revati. > > > > In the main chart or rashi kundali, The 7th house signifying the > > prostrate gland is under heavy malefic influence with the Sun and > > Mercury in it and aspected by Mars and Saturn (both are malefic). > > > > The subsidiary chart or navamsha kundali shows that the cancer > > growth is located at the entrance to the prostate gland. This > > area of the gland is under heavy malefic influence as well. > > > > The treatment may include surgery (due to the influence of Mars) > > and radiation treatment (due to the influence of Rahu in the > > navamsha chart). > > > > Recommendation > > > > 1. Take aggressive action to treat the cancer growth. > > > > Regards, > > > > John R. > > John, > > While I understand that you believe in this > Jyotish stuff, and actually believe that the > information you post above is 1) valid, 2) > useful, and 3) not based on having been told > ahead of time what the medical problem was, > I am less than convinced. > > So I propose another test. Here is the birth > data for a friend who is having a medical > issue. The nature of it will remain unstated, > for obvious reasons, but suffice it to say > that it is serious enough that it has required > and still requires attention from doctors, and > has the possibility of requiring surgery. > > Born: Suffern, New York, USA > September 18, 1965 18:06 (6:06 p.m.) > > So what is my friend's medical issue, and > what is the prognosis and best course of care, > according to Jyotish? > > Waiting with 'bated breath... > > Turq >
