--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "do.rflex" <do.rf...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" <jr_esq@> wrote: > > > > Barry, > > > > I knew that even before you typed the email to the moderators. > > > > JR > > > > John, what specifically did you know -before- Barry "typed the email > to the moderators"? >
Ask Barry. He knows it and he can confirm it. > > > > > PS > > > > Feliz Navidad y Prospero Ano Nuevo! > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Since it appears that JohnR is not going to > > > respond to my challenge with his analysis of > > > my friend's medical condition as indicated in > > > her Jyotish chart, and I want to finish up my > > > participation in all existing threads on FFL > > > before the new year starts, I will post the > > > answer. > > > > > > ( It goes without saying that any subsequent > > > attempts by JohnR or any other Jyotishi to > > > say, "Oh, I saw that in the chart, but I was > > > just late in posting my response" should be > > > greeted with howls of derisive laughter. :-) > > > > > > The medical issue my friend is dealing with is > > > called being pregnant. > > > > > > Other than that simple and fairly common medical > > > issue, she is 100% healthy. Her doctors, both > > > allopathic and from the world of alternative > > > medicine, believe that she will have a normal > > > home birth, but just in case, arrangements have > > > been made by the midwives at a nearby hospital > > > in case she requires surgery. We all hope that > > > isn't necessary. > > > > > > Below is the text I sent to the FFL moderators. > > > The only thing I changed in it was to delete > > > my friend's last name (for privacy, and to keep > > > stalkers away from her) and to insert the word > > > "best" in front of "friend," because she really > > > is my best friend. I'm heading off in a few min- > > > utes to spend the rest of the year with her, > > > even though that'll only be five hours. :-) > > > > > > Had JohnR analyzed the chart and posted that he > > > "found" indicators of disease, that would have > > > been partly because I described her condition as > > > a medical issue. Well, duh, it is. Giving birth > > > IS a medical issue, and never a 100% safe one. > > > But IMO the only reason he would have "found" > > > indicators of disease in her chart would have been > > > because *he was looking for them*, and projecting > > > them onto a chart in which they did not appear. > > > > > > Similarly, when Judy and Raunchydog accused me > > > of violating my friend's privacy by making her > > > medical condition public, they were *looking for > > > things to demonize me with*, and projecting them > > > onto the situation in the form of the bogus > > > "privacy" straw man. Please join me in laughing > > > at their attempts to portray me as a Bad Guy for > > > violating my friend's "medical privacy." It's > > > hard to *miss* the medical condition of someone > > > who is eight and a half months pregnant; keeping > > > it private is just not an option unless you are > > > wearing a tent. :-) > > > > > > The original letter to the FFL moderators follows, > > > in case someone actually wants them to confirm that > > > this is what I sent to them earlier. As noted > > > above, the only thing in it I have changed is to > > > delete my friend's last name out of concern that > > > one or more TBs here would start stalking her the > > > same way that they stalk me and Vaj and Paul Mason > > > and John Knapp and others who have dared to be > > > critical of TM or its ludicrous "extra added cost" > > > products like Jyotish. > > > > > > I still think that this would have been an interest- > > > ing test, if JohnR had had the cojones to respond > > > to it. But he didn't. I think that speaks for itself > > > about the depth of *his* belief in the accuracy and > > > efficacy of Jyotish. > > > > > > But the interesting test that DID take place was > > > how a few TM True Believers here responded to the > > > idea of Jyotish being put to the test. If John's > > > lack of a response speaks volumes, theirs fills > > > libraries. > > > > > > Happy New Year, > > > > > > Unc/Turq/Barry > > > > > > > > > *************************************************** > > > > > > Sent to Rick, Alex, and gullible_fool: > > > > > > As mentioned on FFL, I am challenging JohnR to > > > use the birth data below to pinpoint the nature > > > of the medical condition that my friend is deal- > > > ing with. > > > > > > The birth data: > > > > > > Born: Suffern, New York, USA > > > September 18, 1965 18:06 (6:06 p.m.) > > > > > > The person, and their medical condition: > > > > > > This is the birth data for my best friend Laurel, > > > who is very, very pregnant and about to give birth. > > > Both medical doctors and alternative care providers > > > have assured her that all is perfectly fine with > > > the pregnancy, and that there is no danger to either > > > mother or (soon) daughter. A normal birth is planned, > > > but as I said there is the possibility of required > > > surgery if things don't go as planned. > > > > > > As I understand Jyotish, *if it works* John should > > > have no problem with noticing this medical condition > > > in her chart, even if I did not specify the sex of > > > the person. In fact another Jyotish practitioner > > > DID, in fact, predict the pregnancy from her chart > > > a year before it happened. She wasn't trying to > > > get pregnant. > > > > > >
