Nice post Raunchy. I appreciate any attempt by the interesting writers in this group to build bridges.
I also think that such a test would be interesting and even without being definitive, it would provoke plenty of worthwhile thought on both sides of the belief fence. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchy...@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > What he seems to be doing is claiming AFTER THE > > FACT AND WITH NO POSSIBILITY OF PROOF > > that he "knew" that my friend's medical condition > > was that she was pregnant. > > > > I think that's total bullshit. > > Barry, I thought your initial challenge to John's Jyotish abilities > was a set up for a smack down. You recovered some credibility when you > offered a blind test, but I was still skeptical you might pull a fast > one by posting the Jyotish of one of your dogs. Sorry for doubting > you, but we haven't been on friendly terms from the git-go. I admire > your writing abilities minus the nasty crap and that's the best > compliment I can muster for today. > > I'd like to see another Jyotish test that has fairness and integrity > on both sides of the challenge. Yes, John dropped the ball while > protecting his own, but he was understandably suspicious of knives at > the ready. Jyotish has been around for a long time, you'd think it > would have been tested plenty already. I really want to know if it's > any better than reading tea leaves or Tarot. >
