The concept that there's a brown dwarf star orbiting our sun with a period of 3,500 years is so easily dismissed that you should be at least duct taped to a tree by hoodlums for the crime of public inanity.
Any such orb would have been spotted by humanity's earliest naked-eye astronomers and reported with enough accuracy for us to find it today, and that's just for starters. We have sent satellites around the sun and looked, so there's none of this "hiding behind the sun" nonsense. Any brown dwarf would be at least bigger than Jupiter, and even Jupiter's mass would be enough to detect perturbations in our system of planets if it were in the same orbit proposed by this piece-of-shit-channeling-crappola. Our sun wobbles around a central point due to the gravity of its planets, and our present day ability already can detect that our Earth makes the sun wobble one foot from that center. Any brown dwarf close enough to be in gravitation relationship with our sun would be wobbling it very very much more, but, alas, none such is found. This pdf file is pure bullshit, and it marauds the common weal by eroding the astronomical education of the masses by confusing those who do not have the experience to recognize it as the vile anti-intellectualism it is. Shame on you for spreading it around -- it's shit but it sure ain't fertilizer. Edg --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "uns_tressor" <uns_tres...@...> wrote: > > > > tartbrain <no_reply@> wrote: > > I am not a doomsdayer. > > > > However, for me, the 8.8 quake in Chile takes us to > >the outer range of "normal flow of events" -- or at > >least gives me pause to consider that something outside > >the pattern of normality. > > > There is a theory that a large planet is coming round the > sun, on an orbit of 3,500 years, and could cause serious > problems due to its gravity. I got this link from a TMer > in England: > http://www.free-energy-info.co.uk/Chapter15.pdf > (For those with a Physics bent, Chapter 1, Intro > and Conclusion are also recommended) > Uns. >
