"Post autopsy"...that's a good one! http://www.startlingart.com/Viewer.asp?ImageSource=fine_art&FileName=Alien_Autopsy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Joe" <geezerfreak@...> wrote: > > Judy, the reason I don't comment on the Judy/Barry wars is that those are the > very reason I bail for extended periods of time. > > All of this angst over who said what, and how many times and the extensive > cataloging "for the record" (what ever the hell that means) is mind numbingly > boring to me. I would be willing to bet that it's similarly boring to many of > the respondents here at FFL. > > I mean, read this: > > "Barry even thought Joe was disagreeing with the premise, > leaping to agree with Joe without realizing that Joe was > agreeing with wayback, who was agreeing with me, and that > I agreed with everything both of them said. (Interestingly, > of the four of us who participated, Joe's the only one who > has refrained from pointing out to Barry that--to put it > mildly--he had missed the point.)" > > Judy, I enjoy most discourse with you, but seriously, does anyone care about > these tortured score keeping post autopsies regarding you and Barry? I > certainly don't. > > I'm going to guess (though I don't know for sure) that one of the reasons > Barry avoids direct communication with you about these things is that he > finds it boring as well. > > Having said that, I agree that the rest of the conversation this week about > gurus, gunas and right action has been fascinating and anything but boring. > Its great discussions like these that keep me coming back! > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > <snip> > > > > Amen. Me, I've got to cry bullshit at this latest attempt to > > > > give MMY a free ride and claim he never made any mistakes. > > <snip> > > > > [wayback:] > > > For me, this whole guna thing means I don't feel guilty when > > > disagreeing with a guru. Gurus have a personality and so do > > > I. Mine might be more likable or smarter or meaner - > > > whatever- but we each have our own. The way I take all this > > > is that if a guru has sex with students, steals money, is > > > mean - I can easily be angry without wondering if perhaps I > > > am missing some ultimate cosmic goodness in their nasty > > > behavior. > > <snip> > > > So things happen without our involvement in a sense, without > > > really making choices, and yet we still have to hold each > > > other responsible cause we live here and it feels as if we > > > are creators of our thoughts. > > <snip> > > > When it comes to having more, like Blazing Brahman or > > > Enlightenment, I just don't think it has much at all to do > > > with regular life - it does not seem to guarantee good > > > behavior that is for sure. > > <snip> > > > > I couldn't agree more strongly with everything wayback > > says, including what I snipped. > > > > We all know why Barry went on this tirade. Anybody who's > > followed the exchange with any attention knows he got > > the premise and its implications backwards, inside out, > > and upside down because he was more intent on trying to > > put down the person who proposed the premise than in > > understanding it. > > > > I made the post that started the discussion; Joe, wayback, > > and blusc0ut all agreed with that post and proceeded to > > elaborate on its implications. I agreed with all their > > elaborations and added a few of my own. It's rare that we > > see such unanimity among any four people on FFL, > > especially four people who frequently disagree about other > > things. > > > >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdFg6seiRdg > > The gunas seem to be programmed to lead Barry to make a > > fool of himself as often as possible. You gotta feel > > sorry for him, but unfortunately that doesn't relieve him > > of responsibility for being a fool. ;-) > > >
