--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Apr 11, 2011, at 5:36 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote: > > >>> If people asked him, he wasn't breaking any laws in > >>> stating his opinion. Do you need a license now to > >>> have opinions? > >> > >> To them he wasn't merely stating an opinion, it was the word, the promise > >> of an omniscient sage. > > > > Since when does magical thinking make someone > > else responsible for that person's decisions? > > Unfortunately, I doubt HH the Maharishi thought he using magical thinking, > nor did his students. They expected a cure--and acted accordingly--costing > them their lives and/or a peaceful transition. > > > > > >> Practicing medicine without a license is a fairly serious charge. > > > > Of course it would be. But if giving an opinion when asked > > constitutes "practicing medicine without a license" > > we should all be in jail. Vaj, no offense or anything, > > but in your zeal to accuse MMY of something, anything, > > I think you're sort of losing it here. > > That's just it, I don't feel any great, imagined "zeal". These are just > facts, and old news, for me. > > When I hear it coming from former prominent students and his personal > physician, I'm sorry, I stop and take notice. I consider him responsible for > these people's deaths--as do many others. > > I hope you eventually get to talk to these people as I have. Then you'll be > singing a different tune.
Can you say which personal physician? Or the names of anyone who followed this advice and lost a loved one? I don't disbelieve you on this, just wondered who we are talking about. >
