> > Since there is abundant evidence that Sai Baba > > was a pedophile fraud... > > nablusoss1008: > Is that so? Where is that "abundant evidence"? > There is no evidence and there are no charges in Indian courts against Sai Baba. And, since Baba is probably dead, there's no chance for a cross-examination, so there's no case, just rumors, just like Joe posted about MMY.
So, maybe Joe would like to post some evidence, or keep his big pie hole shut about other people's private sex life, or lack thereof.
