--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@...> wrote:
>
> If I may interject here, AAB -- AFAIK I am neither MZ, nor William of Occam
> -- but just for the record, I also found at a certain point that CC, GC, and
> UC were both experienceable at will and were essentially ephemeral: that is,
> they too were simply experiences which had a beginning and an ending, being
> waves or manifestations of a much "larger" That, or Us -- which is a priori
> and is a kind of indescribable perfection which simply IS and has always been
> here and now, but which we had conveniently managed to overlook by virtue of
> being unconsciously attached to the idea of a separate experiencer: an
> I-particle which was addicted to the idea of growth, of being in spacetime,
> which consequently rejected that Us as being its own death.
>
> Perhaps not coincidentally, it was RC himself who in "confronting" me
> delivered one of the coups-de-grace which finally shook Us loose from that
> particular identification. (For which, thank you again, Robin.) But it
> appears many others have come to the same realization. One such was Jay
> Latham, who wrote in Galaxy of Fire of this Understanding and of his
> confronting Maharishi with his realization that CC, GC, and UC were
> essentially BS (my paraphrase) and of Maharishi's vehemently enthusiastic
> endorsement of his realization ("YES! YES! YES!").
>
> And in retrospect, it appears self-evidently obvious that MMY knew this state
> well and spoke of it as Brahman or as the "pathless path from here to here,"
> but we hadn't ears to hear here :-)
Thank you Rory, nice to have you back !
