Yes, seeing our existence from the perspective of ripening UC or BC then makes
the states of CC, GC and UC similar to an invisible Being consciously removing
its bandages, and quickly becoming One.
First the unwrapping of the top of the head and the heart - CC, Next, the
unwrapping of the eyes, ears, mouth, nose, fingertips, and soles of the feet -
GC, and finally the rest of the body is unwrapped - UC. The unbridled Being
then begins to expand at light speed across the cosmos - BC. Finally it is time
for doing that next load of wash, maybe another cup of Chai, and a hot tub.
Looks like a beautiful Saturday!:-)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "RoryGoff" <rorygoff@> wrote:
> > <snip>
> > > Perhaps not coincidentally, it was RC himself who in "confronting"
> > > me delivered one of the coups-de-grace which finally shook Us
> > > loose from that particular identification. (For which, thank you
> > > again, Robin.) But it appears many others have come to the same
> > > realization. One such was Jay Latham, who wrote in Galaxy of Fire
> > > of this Understanding and of his confronting Maharishi with his
> > > realization that CC, GC, and UC were essentially BS (my paraphrase)
> > > and of Maharishi's vehemently enthusiastic endorsement of his
> > > realization ("YES! YES! YES!").
> >
> > See here for an excerpt from his book recounting this
> > episode:
> >
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/71883
> >
> > Not sure this is the same as what MZ is saying now. Hope
> > he'll comment on it.
>
> Thanks, Judy. Right, it may well not be, and I hope he will too.
>
> I was mainly just pointing out that others have seen the "lie" of CC/GC/UC
> and that MMY himself enthusiastically endorsed such an Understanding (if we
> are to believe Jay Latham, and I do).
>
> (For me, this Understanding is not yet another "higher state of
> consciousness" as it really isn't a state at all, isn't any "thing" at all
> (though it happily includes everything). If anything, it is a simple relief
> from the tension of the I-particle's unconscious "lie" of evolution in
> spacetime.)
>
