--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002" <danfriedman2002@...> wrote: > > But Curtis, > > What you are saying is that Rick reported gossip years ago, which later > appeared in a book by the gossiper. That´s not fire, only Smoke.
So you are not a fan of first person histories are you? Then how do you learn about the past if you dismiss first person accounts as gossip? Of course if you read the book and found some specific places where you question her credibility I would enjoy hearing them. I am assuming that you wouldn't be shallow enough to make this judgement about her book without having read it. You know kind of prejudging it based on gossip you heard about what was in the book. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@> > wrote: > > > > I'm with Sal on this one Dan. This request is not reasonable. > > > > And as far as Rick not coming through with facts, he backed Judith's > > account for years, was way ahead of the curve, and then the book came out. > > So I think we can drop the tired "innuendo" routine now. > > > > What Rick is "prone" to is having an open mind. He has created a place > > where atheist's can interact with the formerly enlightened as well as the > > currently "whatever". Not too shabby IMO. > > > > Although we have come down in different places concerning spirituality, I > > have respect for the integrity of the process that lead him to his own > > different conclusions. > > > > And if he smells smoke, I'm betting on fire soon to come. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote: > > > > > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:19 PM, danfriedman2002 wrote: > > > > > > > Your request for a picture of a sign is a good one. But then we'd be > > > > dealing with facts. Rick's prone to innuendo, not facts. > > > > > > Um, Dan...Rick hasn't been in the Doom in years. > > > And, like most other people without badges, > > > has no way of getting in. And do you really > > > think with all the paranoia in the TMO they'd > > > let someone take pictures? You ask for > > > evidence that I'm pretty sure you know nobody > > > can supply. Therefore, for you the situation > > > doesn't exist. If that works for you, great. > > > > > > Sal > > > > > >
