I don´t chose books on (1) personal intimacies, or (2) gossip.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "wayback71" <wayback71@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues" <curtisdeltablues@>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "danfriedman2002" <danfriedman2002@>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > But Curtis,
> > >
> > > What you are saying is that Rick reported gossip years ago, which later
> > > appeared in a book by the gossiper. That´s not fire, only Smoke.
>
> Dan, Judithe is not the only woman to make these claims. Several other women
> have as well. Read the book and then let us know what you think.
> >
> > So you are not a fan of first person histories are you? Then how do you
> > learn about the past if you dismiss first person accounts as gossip?
> >
> > Of course if you read the book and found some specific places where you
> > question her credibility I would enjoy hearing them. I am assuming that
> > you wouldn't be shallow enough to make this judgement about her book
> > without having read it. You know kind of prejudging it based on gossip you
> > heard about what was in the book.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > <curtisdeltablues@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I'm with Sal on this one Dan. This request is not reasonable.
> > > >
> > > > And as far as Rick not coming through with facts, he backed Judith's
> > > > account for years, was way ahead of the curve, and then the book came
> > > > out. So I think we can drop the tired "innuendo" routine now.
> > > >
> > > > What Rick is "prone" to is having an open mind. He has created a place
> > > > where atheist's can interact with the formerly enlightened as well as
> > > > the currently "whatever". Not too shabby IMO.
> > > >
> > > > Although we have come down in different places concerning spirituality,
> > > > I have respect for the integrity of the process that lead him to his
> > > > own different conclusions.
> > > >
> > > > And if he smells smoke, I'm betting on fire soon to come.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <salsunshine@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Jun 28, 2011, at 8:19 PM, danfriedman2002 wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Your request for a picture of a sign is a good one. But then we'd
> > > > > > be dealing with facts. Rick's prone to innuendo, not facts.
> > > > >
> > > > > Um, Dan...Rick hasn't been in the Doom in years.
> > > > > And, like most other people without badges,
> > > > > has no way of getting in. And do you really
> > > > > think with all the paranoia in the TMO they'd
> > > > > let someone take pictures? You ask for
> > > > > evidence that I'm pretty sure you know nobody
> > > > > can supply. Therefore, for you the situation
> > > > > doesn't exist. If that works for you, great.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sal
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
