Do you still enjoy molesting children, Vaj, or just animals now? You are one sick, perverted Buddhist.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <vajradhatu@...> wrote: > > > On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:02 PM, maskedzebra wrote: > > > RESPONSE II: Not every love has the quality of friendship. In the first > > place it is reserved to that love for another which wills his well-being. > > When what we will is not the other's good for his sake, but the desire of > > it as it affects us, that is not friendship, but self-regarding love and > > some sort of concupiscence. Neither does benevolence suffice for > > friendship; in addition a mutual loving is required, for friend is friend > > to friend. This interplay of well-wishing is founded on companionship. > > It's shown that Buddhists in higher states of consciousness meditate on > objectless compassion: love beyond mere objects. How sad for Aquinas' circle > jerk. It does sound like the perfect rationale for child molesters - how > clever! > > You should send that one to Jerry Sandusky, I bet he'd find great consolation > in it. >
