Kiss Kiss!  ; )

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@...> wrote:
>
> <snip>
> "Then Judy joined in as if his tirade were just another cute thing the pool 
> boy does as he cleans her pool as she sips vodka enhanced ice tea lemonades 
> enjoying the view. Kiss kiss Ravi, you are so hot! See how it works Ravi, she 
> would be buying YOU drinks in a bar, does it all make sense now why the hot 
> young thing slipped out the back door while you found out the number she gave 
> you was fake?"
> 
> 
> Curtis, I believe you've taken this out of context.  I was teasing Ravi 
> about his cute photo (IMO) and mentioned in my post that Obba or Judy might 
> give him a "kiss-kiss" as there was also a short string of tease posts that 
> had already happened where Obba had used that term.  Judy was likely just 
> playing on my post and replying in the affirmative around the pic only. 
>  This was my post.  
> 
> 
> "Ravi, wait, I forgot to emphasize...this picture of you IS "HOT" - try and 
> stay objective in your review :)  I'm sure that Obba would give you a wet 
> KISS KISS on this one.  Judy might pile on with a "kiss-kiss" if you are 
> really lucky.  If Bob wasn't vacationing somewhere on a remote romantic 
> island with "the wife", he could probably send you the appropriate movie clip 
> to seal the deal.  Now, for me the word "hot" is a new one, so I'm using my 
> intuition on this one."
> 
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> From: curtisdeltablues <curtisdeltablues@...>
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 3, 2012 8:41 AM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Happy new year to everyone !!! (And more love 
> bombing..)
> 
> 
> 
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> 
> Snipped the dancing routine, sooo Nancy Grace in the groaning 3 inch 
> heels.  But this is the good part cuz her refusal to accept that she has 
> been called out was just predictable.
> 
> Here is where I start hearing the music from the start of the twilight zone 
> in my head.
> 
> > It's amazing how Curtis engineered all this to make
> > himself appear to be the totally blameless victim by a
> > series of moves that's so convoluted nobody gets what
> > he's done except those he's done it *to*. And not for
> > the first time, either.
> > 
> > That's one thing at which he's better than anyone here.
> 
> And this is not the first time you have accused me of such a bizarre 
> thing.  And on a public board no less where we all read all the posts if we 
> want to.  And I am able to hide my deviousness from everyone but Judy, how 
> can that be?  Oh I know, it has to do with her inflated sense of her 
> perceptive powers to detect evil, beyond all other posters reading the same 
> posts.
> 
> Let me defend myself from this twisted claim of special powers of deceit in 
> plan sight.
> 
> Ravi was spinning a tale of how he has no sexual desire from his self 
> proclaimed "whatever" state for the umpteenth time, while describing the old 
> guy in the club behavior I get to see on a regular basis during performances 
> where alcohol is served.  The only people I hear talking about having no 
> sexual desire uninvited, and relevant to nothing that applies to us, are 
> preachers running a "I'm too special for human feelings" like Jerry 
> Falwell.  In the end they are usually revealed to be hypocrites who were 
> compelled to make their denials because they are selling a story about 
> themselves.  Like Ravi is. And I would have just let it pass but he also 
> called me dishonest for the millionth time with zero evidence. So I commented 
> on how he appeared to me.
> 
> Then Ravi claimed that he wasn't really buying drinks for an underage girl 
> which was his original story.  I am guessing that he ended up looking a bit 
> loseresque getting worked by a Tom Sawyer in hot pants and a tank top.  So 
> he tried to cover his tracks but once I smelled a rat I didn't buy his 
> denial. I think he really did go to a club and have a young girl work him for 
> free drinks before telling him she needed to go to the bathroom and run out 
> of the club giggling with her friends full of Ravi financed liquor.  So he 
> flew off the handle and called me names, some of which are out of line so I 
> let him know I felt that way.  I tried to explain to him the deeper context 
> of his slurs and how they really don't belong here.  Labeling someone's 
> behavior as desperate or his denials of having human feelings like the rest 
> of us is not the same thing as being called a retard, (the N word of the 
> disabled community) or an unhinged assault being called
>  someone's bitch, which among men is rarely used face to face because it is 
> an invitation to fight. Online it is extreme trollish behavior.  Then he 
> doubled down again and lied about why I left the movement.
> 
> Then Judy joined in as if his tirade were just another cute thing the pool 
> boy does as he cleans her pool as she sips vodka enhanced ice tea lemonades 
> enjoying the view.  Kiss kiss Ravi, you are so hot!  See how it works 
> Ravi, she would be buying YOU drinks in a bar, does it all make sense now why 
> the hot young thing slipped out the back door while you found out the number 
> she gave you was fake?
> 
> I was reminded of her posturing against what she considered unfair posts and 
> how she castigated me for not stepping in to scold other posters who attack 
> her.  I remember the rash of shit she has flung my way concerning me not 
> busyboding myself about what other people say to her.  I realized that she 
> was really in the exact situation where if she has an ounce of the integrity 
> and ethical values she bloviates around here like it is her special badge of 
> honor, she would say in her I love hot Ravi manor, "hey Ravi, perhaps you 
> could turn it down a notch, some of us read here."  But no.
> 
> And I frankly don't care if she didn't, and don't need her to come to my aid 
> for a mouthy dude who calls other men names while out of their reach.  But 
> I notice the hypocrisy and I called her on it and asking her to get off my 
> case for doing the exact same thing, choosing my battles here, and letting us 
> fight our own. And without the rash of hypocritical shit, that would be a 
> reasonable position that I endorse here.
> 
> But then she chose to enter the Twilight Zone to try to slip out of getting 
> called on bullshit.  It was me who made Ravi use derogatory terms for 
> mentally disabled people, lie about why I left the movement, and lay into a 
> demeaning tirade.
> 
> One that other posters noticed was over the trollish line.
> 
> But not Judy.  Judy saw secret Curtis deviousness at work orchestrating 
> Ravi's bad behavior from his secret lair.  And that defending myself from 
> an unwarranted meltdown attack is because I've been fighting a computer virus 
> and it has unhinged me. 
> 
> And only she can see it, but all you other dimwits who read these posts are 
> unable to penetrate my devious ways. 
> 
> Out of all of this I am looking forward to a 2012 with zero "you need to 
> scold other people for things they say to me" posts.
> 
> Zero.
> 
> > 
> > 
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, obbajeeba <no_reply@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <jstein@> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > <snip>
> > > > > > > > > > I still am waiting to hear from you:  do you think
> > > > > > > > > > it is ok for Ravi to have told that nasty personal 
> > > > > > > > > > lie about Curtis?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > See if you can rephrase your question so it's not 
> > > > > > > > > offensive and I'll consider answering it.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Do you think it is ok for Ravi to have told that 
> > > > > > > > particular lie about Curtis's leaving the TM movement?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Let's see, "Does Judy think it's OK to tell lies?"
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Nope, still offensive.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Uh, I asked if you think it is ok if Ravi told a Particular
> > > > > > lie in a Particular instance?  Not a general statement about
> > > > > > how you feel about lying in general (Does Judy think it is OK
> > > > > > to tell lies?).
> > > > > 
> > > > > So you're unsure of whether a negative response to "Does
> > > > > Judy think it's OK to tell lies?" would cover all lies.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I see.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > A bit of difference, as you well know and would be quite
> > > > > > quick to point out in others.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Not if I were paying attention and wanted to be fair.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > But in your dodging around and unwillingness to answer
> > > > > > I got my answer.
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can manufacture whatever answers and degree of
> > > > > willingness suit your agenda, Susan. They don't have to
> > > > > have anything to do with reality.
> > > > 
> > > > Hey, whatever.  I don't want to hide behind analysis of
> > > > details and words.  Just simple responses would have been
> > > > enough for me.  I am done with this discussion, no interest left. 
> > > 
> > > If one reads the words carefully, Judy is correct to not
> > > wishing to answer the questions as they were written. It
> > > was spin. Who wants to answer spin?
> > 
> > Not only was it spin, the whole basis for the question was
> > disingenuous, since Susan is well aware I'm against lying.
> > But she wanted to hide behind the pretense that there was
> > some uncertainty on that point.
> > 
> > There were any number of questions she *could* have asked
> > that would have cleared up what she genuinely didn't
> > understand. Even if she didn't agree, at least she would
> > have known what she was disagreeing *with*.
> > 
> > It's amazing how Curtis engineered all this to make
> > himself appear to be the totally blameless victim by a
> > series of moves that's so convoluted nobody gets what
> > he's done except those he's done it *to*. And not for
> > the first time, either.
> > 
> > That's one thing at which he's better than anyone here.
> > 
> > 
> > > 
> > > Just saying. 
> > > Happy New Year to us all!
> > >
> >
> 
> 
>   
>


Reply via email to