You are sounding angry. You are using the word "should", which is a term rife with judgment. I seriously don't get this. Where are all these absolutisms coming from? Is this the product of years of meditation? Why is it that the entire exchange that involved numerous people has now simply been reduced to "Judy." Seriously? And, no, don't assume that I am just blindly standing up for Judy because I am on her "side." How completely neanderthal is that? I am making a different point.
The way I see it, there was an exchange. It involved many points of view, many of which were conflicting. This is good. Are we all now going to descend into fear in expressing ourselves because the forum can't handle the conflict? Maybe try and "I" statement, such as..."I" am uncomfortable conversing with Judy because I perceive her as angry and that triggers emotions in me that I don't have the wherewithal to manage. Judy has engaged you in discussions that you appreciated a few weeks ago and now you simply dismiss her summarily with this kind of a judgment that indicates the exact position you "are done with?" Do you not see the irony in this? Do you not do any introspection? Do you hold Judy to a different standard than you hold yourself to? Are you familiar with the concept of forgiveness? Do you consider yourself enlightened? I seriously don't get it. ________________________________ From: zarzari_786 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, January 5, 2012 6:56 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Happy new year to everyone !!! (And more love bombing..) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "richardatrwilliamsdotus" <richard@...> wrote: > > You're all getting really close to > being in big trouble with Judy and > Emily and Raunchy. I don't mind trouble with Judy. I am done with her. She should learn to control her anger before she makes spiritual discussions.
