Buck, who do you believe it is that follows FFL so avidly and who we would be surprised do?
*** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Buck" <dhamiltony2k5@...> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Xenophaneros Anartaxius" > > <anartaxius@> wrote: > > > > > > Is there some reason people are interested in us? > > > > Not bloody likely. :-) > > > > Dear Mr.Turguoiseb, I would respectfully disagree with your (narrow) POV on > this. > I found the recent discussion of SSRS's instruction on silent awareness > during meditation versus the other brand meditation to be particularly well > drawn out on both sides. It was very interesting. I would suspect that both > interested parties, camps of SSRS-AOL'ers and MMY-TM'ers, were downloading > the proceedings like crazy following through the discussion that discerned > some very interesting spiritual nuance. It was very interesting indeed and > certainly drove readership. There were some other subjects too during the > period which evidently drove FFL downloads by non-member lurkers. This new > 'exceeding download' error message seems to revolve around periods of content > driven downloads. Unless these were denial of service downloads, we should > expect now that Yahoo in its liquidation would sell FFL as an asset that > actually drives content views. You'd be amazed who all the audience of this > place is. Some writers would be embarrassed if they realized. > -Buck >
