--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@...> wrote: <snip> > No, I was not aware that Robin posted "on my account." But > thanks for letting me know, Steve.
Of course, he didn't post on your account but under his own name and handle. Here's the post: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319794 > I will admit that I was talking on the phone while reading > FFL last night - a "dangerous" thing to do if you take this > seriously and want to be able to defend yourself here. > Anyway, I gather I was responding to a single post of > Emily's when apparently I had missed an earlier one. Interesting, because last night you claimed to have read Emily's earlier post too: ====================================================== I did read Emily's post. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robin Carlsen" <maskedzebra@...> wrote: > > You have the strangest compulsions, Susan. Read Emily's > post which came before this one. Answer that. You're a > funny lady. But you're right: 90% does it. I feel this > right in my bones. Casey hit a home run. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) It's O.K. > > > Curtis...your reputation is safe. No worries. > > > > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people > > won't bother to spend a minute reading this argumentative, > > odd stuff (good for them!), my guess is that if they did, > > about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the other 1% > > are the ones making the fuss, the noise. ==================================================== http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319735 And then you denied you did any "selective reading": ========================================================= --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Susan" <wayback71@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn <emilymae.reyn@> wrote: > > > > > > Hey now, I'm standing up for Curtis, aren't I :) It's O.K. > > > Curtis...your reputation is safe. No worries. > > > > I'm with you, Emily, and Curtis, on this. Altho most people > > won't bother to spend a minute reading this argumentative, > > odd stuff (good for them!), my guess is that if they did, > > about 99% would side with Curtis. Thing is, the other 1% > > are the ones making the fuss, the noise. > > JESUS. Poor Susan! Maybe she should give a course in > selective reading. Nothing selective about my reading on this. I read the posts. I just don't "side" with you, which is a very different thing than selective reading. =============================================================== http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/319736 And of course my comment had zero to do with whether you were on *my* side. My point was that you read Emily's second post and assumed, incorrectly, that *she* was siding with Curtis. But you had just got done telling Robin that you'd read the earlier one as well, and here you appeared to confirm this ("I read the posts").
