--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote:
>
> -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@>
> wrote:
> >
> > This is an interesting piece, Barry. I guess the premise of projection
> might
> > apply to the writings of Robin as well, yes?
> 
> Hey, if you're saying that he's just pretending to be a "changed man"
> in his writings but at heart he's really still Adolf Hitler, that's your
> take on the situation, not mine.  :-)
> 

Seems to me you missed the premise of your own post.


> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Having written in creative contexts, during which I had to invent
> > > characters and then "put myself inside their heads" to make them
> > > believable, I've always wondered about those who feel that they can
> > > "know" a writer from what they write.
> > >
> > > For example, I've heard supposedly knowledgeable critics call
> Stephen
> > > King "sick" for writing some of his horror scenes, while completely
> > > ignoring some of his more spiritual and uplifting work, such as the
> > > noble quests and characters in, say, "The Talisman." Similarly I've
> seen
> > > people describe William Peter Blatty as "obviously possessed by
> demons
> > > and under the influence of Satan" for writing what others consider
> one
> > > of the most Catholic (and thus religious) books ever written, "The
> > > Exorcist."
> > >
> > > Having had this experience of creating characters or plotlines and
> then
> > > immersing myself in them long enough to write about them in a way
> that
> > > sounds realistic, I'm not convinced of people's claims to be able to
> > > "know" any writer based on what he or she writes. I think that
> instead
> > > people tend to *project* what they want to see onto a passage of
> > > writing, and attribute to the writer emotions, thoughts, or
> qualities he
> > > or she might not have had. Thus someone who already wishes to
> believe
> > > that Maharishi is a Good Guy can read what he writes and see nothing
> but
> > > Good Guyness there, while someone who is already convinced that he
> is a
> > > charlatan can read the same passage and see nothing but charlatanry.
> > >
> > > I think people do this all the time...bring their preconceptions
> about a
> > > writer into play and allow them to color what they read, and their
> > > perceptions of what and who the writer is. For example, the other
> day I
> > > read about a writing workshop in which the students were asked to
> read
> > > the following quote from Gandhi, and comment on what they "saw" of
> the
> > > author's psychological state and overall personality in it.
> Here...you
> > > guys give it a try, too:
> > >
> > > "I can give vent to my inmost feelings only in the form of humble
> thanks
> > > to Providence which called upon me and vouchsafed it to me...to rise
> to
> > > be the leader of my people, so dear to me. Providence showed me the
> way
> > > to free our people from the depths of its misery without bloodshed
> and
> > > to lead it upward once again. Providence granted that I might
> fulfill my
> > > life's task -- to raise my people out of the depths of defeat and to
> > > liberate it from the bonds of the most outrageous dictate of all
> > > times... I have regarded myself as called upon by Providence to
> serve my
> > > own people alone and to deliver them from their frightful misery."
> > >
> > > The students went on and on about the qualities of the noble
> spiritual
> > > leader they saw in this passage, and how perfectly it reflected
> Gandhi's
> > > philosophy of non-violence and dedication to humanity. They compared
> the
> > > style of this paragraph to other famous quotes of Gandhi's, and used
> > > both sets of words to back up their perceptions of the writer as a
> noble
> > > and religious man, nigh unto saintly in his dedication to his fellow
> > > man.
> > >
> > > At the end of the exercise the professor revealed to the students
> that
> > > the quote (with a few "spoiler" words removed) is from a 1939 speech
> > > delivered to the Reichstag by Adolf Hitler.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to