--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" raunchydog@ wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > -- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" <raunchydog@> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > This is an interesting piece, Barry. I guess the premise of > > > > projection might > > > > apply to the writings of Robin as well, yes? > > > > > > Hey, if you're saying that he's just pretending to be a > > > "changed man" in his writings but at heart he's really > > > still Adolf Hitler, that's your > > > take on the situation, not mine. :-) > > > > Seems to me you missed the premise of your own post. > > It seems to me that you missed the whole premise of > another of my posts, that we do NOT have to rely > on either Robin's writing *style* to judge him, or > on the *words* themselves. We have the ACTIONS > that underlie these posts with which to assess him. > > Those actions, since he has first appeared here, > have entailed *consistently* trying to suck people > into one-to-one confrontations with him, so that he > can argue with them and (in his own mind, at least) > "win" and establish his dominance. When doing this, > he has also *consistently* DEMANDED that people not > only read his long, long, insufferably long rants, > but rely to each and every one of the points he > thinks he's raised, as if they *owe* him partici- > pation in his "confrontation fantasies." When one > or more people (such as Curtis or Share) have told > him clearly and unmistakably that they have NO > INTEREST in pursuing such fruitless egobattles > with him, he has *consistently* failed to respect > their choices, and in fact has continued to badger > them, doing anything he could possibly think of > to try to lure them back into a one-on-one with > him. > > These are not things that are revealed in his > words or stylistic choices (as abysmal as they > may be). These are ACTIONS. And they ALL reflect > important behavioral traits seen in people who > suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder. > > Look, you may have succeeded in fooling some other > people here with your act of "defending Robin," > but not me. You're "in it" because he represents > to you a challenge to *other people* you have a > long-standing grudge against, and you see aligning > yourself with him as a way to "get" them. This > behavior on YOUR part is infantile and silly, and > using an arguably mentally ill person to accom- > plish such petty goals is even worse. > > Here's the thing, that neither you nor Judy seem > to understand that you reveal about yourselves and > your real motives -- YOU DON'T ACTUALLY *TALK* > TO ROBIN. You talk *about* him, and use him as an > excuse to dump on other people on this forum you > have taken a dislike to. But do YOU get into his > long, demanding one-on-one's with him? YOU DO > NOT. Do YOU get into long, involved debates about > his so-called philosophy with him? YOU DO NOT. > > Robin is a mere prop for your own bitchy vendettas. > I don't believe that you give a shit about him. > If you wish to prove me wrong, we'll wait for you > to actually have the kinds of conversations and > arguments with him that he seems to seek. If you > don't, I rest my case.
Uh oh. [A fly swatter about to squash a bug.]
