Share doesn't know how to dance or play *with* people, because that would require a vulnerability not present in her.
>________________________________ > From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 7:02 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, >Pros and Cons] > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> >> So Judy, any criticisms for Ravi's over the top post below? Right. I >> thought not. Even though it was obviously way over the top. And it is >> the one that prompted Steve to respond to Ravi. But right, focus on Steve >> and me and our alleged wrong doings. Dredge up the past if need be. But >> definitely ignore Ravi's extreme over reaction. So much for friend's being >> able to speak frankly with each other. > >Each to our own opinion on Ravi's post. I found it rather humorous because it >was typical of his style and the playfulness in it felt less than 'over the >top' to me. But I have found that you don't have the most active sense of >humour, especially when something is directed at you. You like to 'play' but >only when it deflects or is a way for you to skirt around things. Still, you >do have your supporter in Steve so that is nice for you. He is very staunch. >> >> >> Judy to Ravi in Mission >> Accomplished thread: >> >> Good enough, Ravi, thanks. We should all be able to >> speak frankly to those we care about. >> >> >> ________________________________ >> From: Ravi Chivukula >> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 12:57 PM >> Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second >> Attention, Pros and Cons] >> >> >>  >> Not clear enough, hmm.. - OK - I'm working on a sign for my door >> >> 1) Leave your fucking platitudes at the doorstep >> 2) Leave your inauthentic bullshit at the doorstep >> 3) Leave your delusional fantasies at the doorstep >> >> Which one do you think is better my beloved Auntie Share? >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Share Long wrote: >> >> >> > >> >I shall go forth dearest Ravi but only if we can go hand in hand smiley >> >smile (-: >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >________________________________ >> > From: Ravi Chivukula >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 10:16 AM >> >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second >> >Attention, Pros and Cons] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >"The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them." >> > >> > >> >Oh dear Share - with the above statement the automated platitude detector >> >of FFL has recorded this as your 1 millionth platitude on FFL. You are >> >hereby declared to be the avatar of Mother Saraswati. You no longer need to >> >visit any healers, quantum light weavers - your weaknesses have been >> >reduced to naught in one fell swoop, you have been totally healed - no >> >longer you are one of the billions with positives and negatives. Go forth >> >and start your own cult O' Wise lady. >> > >> >On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:26 AM, Share Long wrote: >> > >> > >> >> >> >>Doc, I appreciate what you say about astral being a reflection of >> >>consciousness. Want to add that 2 spiritual teachers I respect a lot say >> >>that there is a definite distinction between the celestial and astral >> >>realms. The celestial realm is NOT the upper astral according to them. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>________________________________ >> >> From: "doctordumbass@..." >> >>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >>Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 9:05 AM >> >>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Asstral [was Re: The Use of the Second Attention, >> >>Pros and Cons] >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Think of it this way - the astral world, meaning all of it, parallels our >> >>consciousness, like two thermometers, side by side, each reading the same >> >>thing. Astral is a higher vibration than physical. The sight one gets from >> >>practicing Patanjali's sutra, or by some other means like peyote (ick) or >> >>mescaline (ugh) or LSD (yuck), will bring you into that world, according >> >>to your level of consciousness at the time. >> >> >> >>Those that experience unpleasant entities are merely seeing the astral >> >>manifestation of their consciousness. Astral means the entire universe of >> >>subtle sight. Of course, once a person is familiar with the full scope of >> >>Being in the astral world, one goes wherever one wants to - Um, kinda like >> >>in "real" life. >> >> >> >>However, it is important to note what one sees with each exploration, most >> >>of which will take a matter of seconds, popping in and out. If the >> >>consciousness is clean, it will naturally be experiencing the Celestial >> >>world, or I suppose, "upper astral". Also, the dynamics are just like >> >>anything else - with more experience, one has greater discrimination, and >> >>freedom of motion. >> >> >> >>If the reverse is true, (and one's consciousness is full of "suspended >> >>solids" - lol), and one forces one's way into the astral, they will >> >>probably see and meet lower entities. Not necessarily demons and >> >>criminals, but tricksters and manipulators. This is what is commonly >> >>called "the astral world" (by dopes like Lenz), but is actually a subset, >> >>based on limited access. >> >> >> >>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Freebie from Doc: >> >>> >> >>> This word "astral" that you and Fred use, could be called "ass-tral" - >> >>> lol, because those that focus on the astral world, vs. Celestial, have a >> >>> low consciousness. >> >>> >> >>> Its like breaking into someone's basement, and really should be avoided >> >>> for all the trouble it causes. The horror movie makers seem to profit, >> >>> but that's about it. >> >>> >> >>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb wrote: >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> >>> > > >> >>> > > Thanks for this. I've heard similar ideas from tantric >> >>> > > teacher David Deida. Also I'm thinking that pushing it >> >>> > > out opens one's aura to astral entities. True? >> >>> > >> >>> > I doubt it. I would say, and I know that Rama did >> >>> > say, that the thing that most opens one up to astral >> >>> > entities is spending any time whatsoever thinking >> >>> > about astral entities. What you focus on you become. >> >>> (schnipp) >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
