Dear Share, Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil Rakshasaas.
I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary. Love, Ravi On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long <sharelon...@yahoo.com> wrote: > ** > > > Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing > with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME > OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude > towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered > him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on > something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches > in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I > realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why > I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices > about me. > > Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to > Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: > wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is > just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. > > By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you > recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse > coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do > when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your > defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? > > I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with > you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to > other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an > interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already > come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is > your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. > There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. > > > to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including > January 2013. > I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any > case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. > I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose > name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. > I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. > I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or > holding a grudge against me. > You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. > > to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor > did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's > post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of > course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as > long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or > carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I > wish you and your family all the best in everything. > ------------------------------ > *From:* Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> > *To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com > *Sent:* Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM > *Subject:* [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > > > boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I > think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely > > I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be > creating some. > > . To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start > confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: > > I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or ask > you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting you now? > Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and now? Oh dear, > this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I mean confrontations. > > > > My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I asked him and > said that it sounded like I had pushed one of your buttons. > > Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. > > > > Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports in grade > school and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: > > Oh, because your comment stated otherwise. Take a look at it again. Not > trying to say that you're wrong just that it looked like you were saying > you were glad you were a woman because it meant you didn't have to worry > about competing or being competitive. > > > > > > Judy thoroughly answered your confront, er comment about Norman churches > in FF, thank you. > > I like the word "thoroughly" you used here to express what you felt was a > positive for you and a negative for me. > > > > John perfectly answered your confront, er comment about the resigning > Pope, responsibility and planets, thank you. > > And "perfectly" here is an interesting observation. I will have to look at > that post again because I don't remember it. Have YOU ever answered me > thoroughly or perfectly do you think? > > > > Concerning my NVC comment about contributing to someone's emotion vs > causing it, I'll refer you to their website since I know how much you enjoy > visiting such. > > You don't need to, you already told me the juiciest part. > >  But beware, if you post it here, turq might call you spammish. Is it > my imagination or is EVERYBODY confusing us for each other?! First turq, > then Obbadohbba. Who's next?! Nabby?! > > Yes, interesting. Probably because we are so much alike. > > > > > > Concerning my comment to Xeno about malignant diagnosis: I bet you > don't understand the Vulcan mind meld either!  > > If it might indicate there is some sort of brain tumour in evidence in > someone then no, I am not familiar with it and it might scare me half to > death anyway. On the other hand, if it relates to some 60's TV show then I > could maybe do some research on the Vulcan mind meld and report back. > > > > PS I LOVE the little spam reference in Subject line. Nature > organizes best (-: > > Is nature in charge of FFL post titles? Would this qualify as support of > nature? > > > > > > >
