Ahhhhh, "selfless" does sound like a compatible quality. I think Xeno was exhibiting "acceptance of whatever." Smile.
>________________________________ > From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2013 8:48 AM >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi > > > > > >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: >> >> Barry?  Barry who? > >Look for the guy with the big callous on his right index finger. All that >button pushing takes its toll. > >> Dear Ann, I'll have you know, I find you far more interesting and I've been >>laughing my ass off at you.  I particularly enjoy your exchanges with Share. >> I can see that the two of you are moving closer and closer to >>"compatibility." > >I do believe you may be correct here, dear Em, especially if by 'compatibl'e >you mean more tolerant and willing to let a lot of things slide by unremarked >upon. Although, now that Share and I both know how much Barry enjoys following >our posts we may just have to keep pumping out the "crap", for his sake you >understand. Share and I are selfless like that. > >> The very nice "thank you for your reply" sounds like you are making good >>progress.  You are a hard case and a tough nut to crack, Ann, but someone is >>finally here to put you in your place and teach you a few manners. > >It's been tried before, with limited success. Hence, the lash marks. > >>  You've been far too independent in your thought process; your sense of >> humor is much too irreverent.  Your insights lack both content and clarity >> and your manners, my dear, your manners. > >My mother, in all truthfulness, would be devastated to hear it (about the >manners). > >> From where I sit, it is clear that the best descriptors around for your >>behavior include "gratuitous," "nasty", and overall -  "negative."  Ann, >>there is a smidgen of hope for you, thanks be to God, but you must stop >>taking things so personally.  I'm not sure who here knows how to do that. > >Maybe Xeno could help me. Anyone who can listen to a potential terminal >diagnosis and not take it personally can surely help me with my problems. > >> I think maybe Bob did, but I hear he is off traipsing through the Himalayas >>these days.  I'm rootin' for you Ann, I really am.  I hope you find the >>perfect prom dress that sets of your beautiful blue eyes with the perfect >>shade of lipstick to match and that you dance the night away in wild abandon. > >I would love to, I really would Emily but I am having a dickens of a time >finding abalone shoes to match the dress. > > Love, Emily >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> > From: Ann >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2013 6:08 PM >> >Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Emily Reyn wrote: >> >> >> >> Ravi, you just made my evening.  So funny, you are.  Share, did you >> >> find this funny?  Is there hope that the equivalent of a "wee dram" of >> >> compatibility exists between the two of you?   >> > >> >A word of caution here Emily. You are getting a tad close to what Barry >> >regards as high school "crap" and if you aren't careful you may not be able >> >to blow your nose. Or was it if you aren't smart enough dynamite will take >> >the top of your head off? No, wait, I think he said if you blow your nose >> >and brains come out you can't blame him. Damn, that can't be Wright, I mean >> >right. You'll have to ask him what he said - I've got to go and figure out >> >what I'm going to wear to the prom. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >________________________________ >> >> > From: Ravi Chivukula >> >> >To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >> >Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 4:11 PM >> >> >Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Alex--this is spam! to Ann Judy Ravi >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >"And oh - Ravi Yogi was some loser who used to post here - any >> >> >coincidence, resemblance to me is imaginary" >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Oh no - not that Ravi Yogi - I loved him once and got burned. He >> >> >represents something unknown, mysterious, dangerous, he's walking on >> >> >razor's edge, he will go down and take me down as well. I'm vulnerable >> >> >and don't want to be harmed - no matter if he changes names, shows me >> >> >how he leads as normal life as any - he is trouble. There's great safety >> >> >in numbers, in the cult - haven't you read the Guru Gita - the Guru is >> >> >stable, predictable, consistent, poses no threat, challenge to me and >> >> >will lead me across. No thank you, Ravi Yogi's crazy - not again, never. >> >> > >> >> >On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula wrote: >> >> > >> >> >Dear Share, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Yay you are awesome - with your persistence I can clearly see I am very >> >> >>prejudiced and hold lots and lots of grudges, as thick as 6 inches of >> >> >>snow on the Fairfield dome, against you. My samskaras are fucked up, my >> >> >>aura too dense, my chakras totally polluted , karma - a big rap sheet, >> >> >>reincarnation - destined to the nether world, the abode of evil >> >> >>Rakshasaas. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>I'm sick Share - have pity on me for god's sake. I'm just waiting for >> >> >>the ascended masters to haul my sorry ass into the age of >> >> >>Enlightenment, till then I keep posting all kinds of cool quotes, >> >> >>pictures from Gandhi, Teresa on my Facebook page. And oh - Ravi Yogi >> >> >>was some loser who used to post here - any coincidence, resemblance to >> >> >>me is imaginary. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Love, >> >> >>Ravi >> >> >> >> >> >>On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Share Long wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our >> >> >>>disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was >> >> >>>exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with >> >> >>>a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd >> >> >>>call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be >> >> >>>negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you >> >> >>>did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy >> >> >>>responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how >> >> >>>desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have >> >> >>>avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices >> >> >>>about me. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post >> >> >>>to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When >> >> >>>you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, >> >> >>>etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a >> >> >>>negative way. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you >> >> >>>recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a >> >> >>>white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is >> >> >>>what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So >> >> >>>it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to >> >> >>>mine? Why is that? >> >> >>> >> >> >>>I've >> >> accepted that we're not >> >> compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't >> >> seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So >> >> I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this >> >> year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative >> >> conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of >> >> course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are >> >> more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL.   >> >>  >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including >> >> >>>January 2013. >> >> >>>I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. >> >> >>>In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your >> >> >>>spin on it. >> >> >>>I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi >> >> >>>whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. >> >> >>>I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or >> >> >>>holding a grudge against me. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to >> >> >>>Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. >> >> >>>Actually I skimmed Steve's >> >> post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of >> >> course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, >> >> as long >> >> as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or >> >> carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. >> >> But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>________________________________ >> >> >>> From: Ann >> >> >>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com >> >> >>>Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM >> >> >>>Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I >> >> >>>> mean. Anywho Annie I think you and I are working off our >> >> >>>> karma with each other very nicely >> >> >>> >> >> >>>I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be >> >> >>>creating some. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>. To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start >> >> >>>confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or >> >> >>>ask you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting >> >> >>>you now? Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and >> >> >>>now? Oh dear, this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I >> >> >>>mean confrontations. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I >> >> >>>> asked him and said that it sounded like I had pushed one of your >> >> >>>> buttons. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports >> >> >>>> in grade school and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Oh, because your comment stated otherwise. Take a look at it again. >> >> >>>Not trying to say that you're wrong just that it looked like you were >> >> >>>saying you were glad you were a woman because it meant you didn't have >> >> >>>to worry about competing or being competitive. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Judy thoroughly answered your confront, er comment about Norman >> >> >>>> churches in FF, thank you. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>I like the word "thoroughly" you used here to express what you felt >> >> >>>was a positive for you and a negative for me. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> John perfectly answered your confront, er comment about the >> >> >>>> resigning Pope, responsibility and planets, thank you. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>And "perfectly" here is an interesting observation. I will have to >> >> >>>look at that post again because I don't remember it. Have YOU ever >> >> >>>answered me thoroughly or perfectly do you think? >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Concerning my NVC comment about contributing to someone's emotion vs >> >> >>>> causing it, I'll refer you to their website since I know how much >> >> >>>> you enjoy visiting such. >> >> >>> >> >> >>>You don't need to, you already told me the juiciest part. >> >> >>> >> >> >>> But beware, if you post it here, turq might call you >> >> >>>spammish. Is it my imagination or is EVERYBODY confusing us >> >> >>>for each other?! First turq, then Obbadohbba. Who's >> >> >>>next?! Nabby?! >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Yes, interesting. Probably because we are so much alike. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> Concerning my comment to Xeno about malignant diagnosis: I >> >> >>>> bet you don't understand the Vulcan mind meld either! >> >> >>>>  >> >> >>> >> >> >>>If it might indicate there is some sort of brain tumour in evidence in >> >> >>>someone then no, I am not familiar with it and it might scare me half >> >> >>>to death anyway. On the other hand, if it relates to some 60's TV show >> >> >>>then I could maybe do some research on the Vulcan mind meld and report >> >> >>>back. >> >> >>>> >> >> >>>> PS I LOVE the little spam reference in Subject >> >> >>>> line. Nature organizes best (-: >> >> >>> >> >> >>>Is nature in charge of FFL post titles? Would this qualify as support >> >> >>>of nature? >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > >
