Ann, these examples of mine below have nothing to do with our disagreeing with each other. They were all instances where I was exchanging with SOME OTHER FFL POSTER and you responded, leading with a negative attitude towards me. For example, your assuming I'd call my ex ex if it bothered him. You also seem desperate to be negative about me when you leap on something casual I say, like you did with what I said about Norman churches in FF. Even Judy responded to you about that. Twice. That's when I realized how desperate you are to see me in a negative way and that is why I have avoided you. I'm not interested in dealing with your prejudices about me.
Even today, you made fun of Mr. Leed for missing the humor of my post to Buck this morning. But you missed it too, didn't you? When you said: wouldn't a true sidha be able to walk to the Dome, etc. Again, this is just you seeing me and writing about me in a negative way. By the way, I noticed you didn't criticize Steve for taking up for you recently in Jan. No making fun of him for being a knight on a white horse coming to the aid of a damsel in distress. Which is what you used to do when he came to my defense. Remember? So it's ok when he comes to your defense but not when he comes to mine? Why is that? I've accepted that we're not compatible and I'm happy to not interact with you. And you don't seem to enjoy what I have to say, even when it's to other posters. So I wonder why you have kept trying to start an interaction with me this year. Especially since it seems you've already come to a negative conclusion about me and or what's in my post. Which is your right of course. But generally I won't be participating in such. There are more enjoyable and or enriching exchanges to be had on FFL. to Judy: when I said Steve recently supported Ann, I was including January 2013. I'm pretty sure I did not reply to Ann before your reply to feste. In any case, I didn't BLAME her for not getting me. That's your spin on it. I skimmed Steve's post to Ravi and missed the bit about Ravi Yogi whose name I wouldn't have recognized anyway. I was talking about turq being ganged up on, not me. I'm not willing to be vulnerable with people who are prejudiced and or holding a grudge against me. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and my posts. to Ravi: I wasn't thinking of you when I wrote my reply to Steve. Nor did I at that time even know who Ravi Yogi is. Actually I skimmed Steve's post so didn't register his reference to Ravi Yogi at all. You are of course entitled to your opinions about me and what I post. However, as long as it sounds to me as if you're still prejudiced against me and or carrying a grudge, I will more than likely not reply to your posts. But I wish you and your family all the best in everything. ________________________________ From: Ann <awoelfleba...@yahoo.com> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 9:05 AM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam! to Ann --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long wrote: > > boy, Obbadohbba, did you ever! Get that wrong I mean. Anywho Annie I > think you and I are working off our karma with each other very nicely I don't think I have any karma to 'work off with you' but we may be creating some. . To celebrate I'm gonna reply to all your attempts to start confrontations, er I mean conversations so far with me here in 2013: I get the impression that if I don't agree with you about something or ask you a question you take it as a confrontation. Am I confronting you now? Oops, and now because I just asked you a question? Oops and now? Oh dear, this could turn into an endless loop of quest, er, I mean confrontations. > > My ex does not mind my calling him ex. He laughed when I asked him and said > that it sounded like I had pushed one of your buttons. Well, since I am no one's 'ex' I don't have a button there to push. > > Of course I know women can be competitive. I played sports in grade school > and high school. And I'm here on FFL (-: Oh, because your comment stated otherwise. Take a look at it again. Not trying to say that you're wrong just that it looked like you were saying you were glad you were a woman because it meant you didn't have to worry about competing or being competitive. > > > Judy thoroughly answered your confront, er comment about Norman churches in > FF, thank you. I like the word "thoroughly" you used here to express what you felt was a positive for you and a negative for me. > > John perfectly answered your confront, er comment about the resigning Pope, > responsibility and planets, thank you. And "perfectly" here is an interesting observation. I will have to look at that post again because I don't remember it. Have YOU ever answered me thoroughly or perfectly do you think? > > Concerning my NVC comment about contributing to someone's emotion vs causing > it, I'll refer you to their website since I know how much you enjoy visiting > such. You don't need to, you already told me the juiciest part.  But beware, if you post it here, turq might call you spammish. Is it my imagination or is EVERYBODY confusing us for each other?! First turq, then Obbadohbba. Who's next?! Nabby?! Yes, interesting. Probably because we are so much alike. > > > Concerning my comment to Xeno about malignant diagnosis: I bet you don't > understand the Vulcan mind meld either!  If it might indicate there is some sort of brain tumour in evidence in someone then no, I am not familiar with it and it might scare me half to death anyway. On the other hand, if it relates to some 60's TV show then I could maybe do some research on the Vulcan mind meld and report back. > > PS I LOVE the little spam reference in Subject line. Nature organizes > best (-: Is nature in charge of FFL post titles? Would this qualify as support of nature?
