I'll see you one William Howell, and raise you a Robin Carlson.  Keep in
mind, I may be holding a Ann Woefle Bader, and the show card is a Lord
Knows.


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Michael Jackson <mjackson74@...>
wrote:
>
> You forgot Anti-Anti-TM and Neutral Robin.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: navashok no_re...@yahoogroups.com
> To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:09 PM
> Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: (Ouch...) Alex--this is spam!
>
>
> Â
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, david allen wrote:
> >
> >
> > Oops, in trouble again.  I wuz just writing an
intro to a seemingly inclusive group...
>
> This is an exclusive group. You should first read here a couple of
month, before you start posting. You should also look into the archives,
so that you know what it is all about. You should read a minimum of 10
long extended posts by maskedzebra, Jude could point out to you which
ones are essential to read. You should also study the Barry /Judy wars,
which go back 17 years, for that you should have a look at
alt.meditation.transcendental. If you don't know what that is, Richard
will explain it to you.
>
> You should also decide to which fraction you want to belong to, with
whom you want to gang up, are you pro-TM or anti-TM, or do you even
pretend to be neutral, are you pro or anti Robin. You could be pro-TM
pro-Robin, anti-TM pro-Robin, anti-Robin pro-TM, or anti-Robin anti-TM,
(did I forget something?) You could be also one of the 'freaks' (not
meant in a bad way, just not fitting anywhere) with an exclusive topic
like Sanskrit or Nokia or Chinese poetry or opera or latest movies.
>
> Once you have completed these initial steps, you are welcome to post
almost anything, except porn and new Yahoo viruses.
>
> > ÂÂ
> > ÂÂ
> > --- On Wed, 2/20/13, authfriend wrote:
> >
> >
> > From: authfriend
> > Subject: [FairfieldLife] Alex--this is spam (was Re: Yer chatter is
bulging my Inbox!)
> > To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
> > Date: Wednesday, February 20, 2013, 6:32 PM
> >
> >
> >
> > ÂÂ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, david allen wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Kyho, Iowans!
> > > ÂÂ
> > > I keep thinking to get off this chatter-group, but only for the
unexpected volume of messaging.  there are plenty of
interesting topics to help get a wider perception of what You Folks are
pondering out there.   And just curious, are there good
career-opportunities in FF for aging "executive-governors"?ÂÂ
  Finally grok-ing some of the diverse spiritual development
advice & practices i've endured or enjoyed,  i
might be a good candidate for any quiet,ÂÂ
guidance-oriented opening in Fairfield, or environs.ÂÂ
> > > ÂÂ
> > > As a registered craniosacral therapist, i figure that You
All, like everybody, could use some quiet, extended-touch
sessions.  Using a fluidbody paradigme with an acquired,ÂÂ
nature-oriented attention-span, my experiences as a recipient, and as a
practitioner, seem alot like that described as the old
Catharic rite of "Consolament".  Reportedly the
sacrament of spiritual baptism, it is described as an arcane
method of human hand-touch ("imposition of hands") which helps to
prepare recipients to confront the Great Mystery.  It wasÂÂ
advised for the clergy, often requested by dying Cathars, and
especially by those expecting torture and immolation for heresy
at the 'hands' of christian-mercenaries during the 1190 - 1220 CE
Albigensian (first internal) Crusade conducted in Southern France, by
the Roman Church.ÂÂ
> > > ÂÂ
> > > Cathars and others sought Consolamentum to rehearse
the experience infusion of Spirit andÂÂ
'body-dropping'.   For myself, vivid Hubble-like
perceptions of a Pleroma of un-winking stars; visceral
cotton-lightness; endless radiant space; etc, all give confidence
to advise looking closer into the BCST paradigme.   And
maybe try some sessions.  They could help Us All settle
deeply into silent and soothing somatic tempos -- just like when
we were tiny, embryonic, aquatic prenates...ÂÂ
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to