I just looked up "compassion" "sympathy" and "empathy" as I was asking myself 
how I define them.  I "feel" for others' and in Share's case, I offered her 
compassion the other day for her "Attachment Disorder" after viewing the host 
of difficult character traits associated with it.  This was not accurate.  What 
I was offering her was "sympathy."  "Compassion" is a big word and has an 
element of action to "relieve suffering" in it.  

You, Ann, demonstrate an online version of compassion in many instances here.  
I don't see this in Share, but I can only talk from my perspective.  Resorting 
to name-calling, as she does with everyone she doesn't like is not a 
compassionate approach - more of a playground approach.  Smile.  

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Ann" <awoelflebater@...> wrote:
>
> 
> 
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" <steve.sundur@> wrote:
> >
> > Bless you Judy.  I am going to take a nod from the Share playbook and
> > offer you compassion.
> 
> Your eyesight is better than mine. I have never seen compassion from Share. 
> She, instead, chooses to view me as arrogant. Are deprecating labels another 
> form of open-heartedness? Emily might have an opinion on this as well. 
> (Emily, feel free to ignore this.)
> 
> > You'll have to find someone else to play with tonight.
> > 
> > 
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"  wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27" steve.sundur@
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > sure Judy.  Carry on with your truth campaign.  as Curtis aptly
> > > > > > pointed out: for someone to constantly declare how "dedicated to
> > > > > > truth" they are, is not unlike the magician telling everyone
> > > > > > repeatedly how "this is a plain, ordinary deck" with which I am
> > > > > > going to perform this trick.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not if the person is in fact dedicated to truth, unlike the
> > > > > magician. Curtis isn't, you aren't (as I just got done noting),
> > > > > Barry obviously isn't. So it isn't at all surprising that the
> > > > > three of you would be anxious to portray a truth-teller as
> > > > > a deceiver, is it?
> > >
> > > Can I assume you're afraid to answer my question, Stevie?
> > >
> > > And that's you in a nutshell, isn't Judy.  You can
> > > > fill in the blank, (as you do),
> > >
> > > Which blank would this be, Stevie?
> > >
> > >  with whomever you determine to be the
> > > > liar of the hour, or the day.  Usually there is no shortage of
> > > > candidates.
> > >
> > > Actually they don't change much from week to week, Stevie.
> > >
> > > > And that, pretty much is how you spend your posts here.
> > >
> > > And that what, Stevie? Your writing is pretty incoherent
> > > tonight. I don't think you quite got what I've been saying.
> > >
> > > But it's obvious you aren't happy about the truths I've
> > > been telling, Stevie--you know, like the one about your
> > > having blamed DrD for bringing up Barry's brother's
> > > suicide when it was actually Barry who did that. And
> > > another truth is that you've never retracted your
> > > accusation nor apologized to DrD for it.
> > >
> > > I'm truly sorry that it makes you so uncomfortable,
> > > Stevie, but them's the breaks.
> > >
> > > > And I am glad you have something to aspire towards.  Perhaps someone
> > > > here will take up your cause and make a nomination.
> > > > I think it would make for a fascinating vetting process.
> > > > And yikes.  Could it be that you could be a possible candidate for
> > the
> > > > two different awards that have shown up now.
> > >
> > > Oh, Stevie, you've already forgotten what I said in my
> > > earlier post, and you've even quoted it below. See if
> > > you can find it. A little practice exercise for you.
> > >
> > > > > > but this is how you choose to spend your life force, so I
> > > > > > hope is gratifying for you.
> > > > >
> > > > > Not being concerned about the truth, you probably aren't
> > > > > aware that there are many people who have dedicated their
> > > > > lives to the truth, sometimes even *sacrificed* their
> > > > > lives to the truth. Truth and truth-telling have generally
> > > > > been highly regarded throughout history, something to
> > > > > strive for.
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.ridenhour.org/prizes_truth_telling.html
> > > > >
> > > > > (I wouldn't consider myself to come close to deserving
> > > > > such a prize because my efforts have been so limited.)
> > > > >
> > > > > But there are always those who can't see the importance of
> > > > > truth, who find it inconvenient and annoying, not worth the
> > > > > effort; and even those who believe truth just gets in the
> > > > > way of their needs and desires and whims. And sometimes, of
> > > > > course, such people are just cowards who *fear* the truth.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "seventhray27"
> > steve.sundur@
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I wonder if anyone even reads those rebuttals. But I suppose
> > > > > > > > they are gratifying to you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Right, the point is to get the truth on the record.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I mean, for example, I certainly wouldn't expect you
> > > > > > > to retract and apologize for accusing DrD of bringing
> > > > > > > up Barry's brother's suicide when, as I pointed out in
> > > > > > > one of those posts, it was actually Barry himself who
> > > > > > > had done so.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > But that error--blaming DrD for Barry's own behavior--
> > > > > > > can't be allowed to stand unrefuted.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > That's just the way it is in this world. Some people
> > > > > > > care about the truth, and some don't. The former can't
> > > > > > > force the latter to care, so they do the best they can
> > > > > > > to ensure the truth is not obscured by those who don't
> > > > > > > care about it.
> > >
> >
>


Reply via email to