--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@... <no_reply@...> wrote: > > The wavicles and particles stuff is a pretty close analogy to > the properties of a photon. That's it. Not really a big > challenge to see us in terms of both wave function and > particle function, is it?
Well, yes, it sure is for me. Human beans aren't photons. But I don't really mind Rory's odd language; I was just pointing out that a lot of it isn't TM-based. (And I've never heard TMers refer to themselves, as individuals, as "Us.") > And seeing everyone inside oneself is not a perception I share > with Rory, except to take complete responsibility for all of > my personal interactions, which is nearly the same thing. It's the bit about "healing" the parts of others that he holds inside himself I found egotistical. > Rather than see it as a statement of ego, I see it as Rory's > statement of responsibility. > > Having said that, I posted earlier about teaching and managing, and how both > disciplines lead to creativity of expression, when trying to make a point. > The last thing I want to do when conveying info, is use language that first > needs a lot of explanation. > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > Ravi - As Rory, said, a lot of this is shorthand, for *shared* > > > experiences, within the context of the symptoms that Maharishi > > > associated with each one. > > > > Some of it is, and some of it is peculiar (in both senses > > of the term!) to Rory, the "wavicles" and "particles" kind > > of stuff, as Ravi notes below.
