--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@...> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > The wavicles and particles stuff is a pretty close analogy to > > the properties of a photon. That's it. Not really a big > > challenge to see us in terms of both wave function and > > particle function, is it? > > Well, yes, it sure is for me. Human beans aren't photons.
I'll leave further comment to my wavicle/particle buddy... > > But I don't really mind Rory's odd language; I was just > pointing out that a lot of it isn't TM-based. (And I've > never heard TMers refer to themselves, as individuals, > as "Us.") Yep. > > > And seeing everyone inside oneself is not a perception I share > > with Rory, except to take complete responsibility for all of > > my personal interactions, which is nearly the same thing. > > It's the bit about "healing" the parts of others that he > holds inside himself I found egotistical. More conventionally, it can be understood as coming to a complete union with others, full acceptance within himself; no internal resistance. But, again, this is in terms of a context that I do not share. Rather, I go at it in terms of what Maharishi said, "The world is, as you are". Very similar. > > > Rather than see it as a statement of ego, I see it as Rory's > > statement of responsibility. > > > > Having said that, I posted earlier about teaching and managing, and how > > both disciplines lead to creativity of expression, when trying to make a > > point. The last thing I want to do when conveying info, is use language > > that first needs a lot of explanation. > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <authfriend@> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, doctordumbass@ <no_reply@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Ravi - As Rory, said, a lot of this is shorthand, for *shared* > > > > experiences, within the context of the symptoms that Maharishi > > > > associated with each one. > > > > > > Some of it is, and some of it is peculiar (in both senses > > > of the term!) to Rory, the "wavicles" and "particles" kind > > > of stuff, as Ravi notes below. >