This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let me know. (But HINT: Read the exchange on alt.m.t at the URL. Oh, and "Pedro" was not Vaj; he was a crazy fundamentalist Christian who infested alt.m.t for a while. Nor have I ever denied I'm a partisan liberal Democrat.)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <punditster@...> wrote: There is one thing you will never see from Judy - she will absolutely never admit that she was in error or that she is a partisan politico. She's been doing this for fifteen years on internet discussion groups. In one hilarious exchange, years ago on Usenet, I posted a link to a Gallup Poll showing the Bush job approval rating. After Judy disputed my statement, I went back three times to check the results of the poll. In desperation, Judy's last statement was something to the effect that I was was a "molusk" for posting a link to a poll that proved the opposite of what I was saying. Go figure. At that point, I realized that this lady was so invested in winning a debate that she would stoop to outright slander in order win a debate. Never mind the facts of the poll, I'm just pointing out the typical style of argument Judy uses to demean her debating opponent. What's interesting about this exchange is that Pedro (Vaj) saw right through Judy's posing as a political pundit and even posted a note that proved Judy's overt partisanship. LoL! That's about the time Judy stopped commenting on any of my posts, except for calling me a "troll" and a "liar", and became an ECHO, trying to get everyone else to shun me - because I had dared to dispute her political view. Go figure. Look, I'm not stupid and I can read the newspaper and I'll always admit when I'm dead wrong about the political facts. The actual graphic is no longer online, but you can get the jist of the conversation below. Judy's last resort when she is losing a debate is to post an echo and ad hominem. In this case, I became a "molusk" and "slime" in a political debate. Now that's classy! From the Usenet archives: From: Judy Stein Subject: Re: OT: Bush Approval 49% Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: 2004-06-16 12:46:42 PST http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq I take it back, a mollusk is smarter than he is. What's the next step down the evolutionary ladder from a mollusk? No, make it three or four steps down. Not quite to slime mold, but close. From: Judy Stein Subject: Re: OT: Bush Approval 49% Newsgroups: alt.meditation.transcendental Date: 2004-06-16 20:28:53 PST http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq http://tinyurl.com/oruvtdq I'm wrong again, he *has* made it to slime mold.
