I don't think you have even remotely established this as "standard practice." 
On the contrary, it's an unusual deviation from the norm. I wasn't impressed by 
the link you provided. It was a lot of people asking about the use of periods 
after every word, but not a single example that I could see. Nor have I seen a 
single example of its use by a good writer. Where are these blogs in which it 
is "standard practice"?
 

 In answer to your question, I do not in general read Turquoise B. He is a mean 
S.O.B. so I usually avoid him. 

 

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 What is with you? I wouldn't have said it if I didn't mean it. But don't 
overinterpret. It's not that every time someone wants to be emphatic, they use 
it. Rather, it's "standard" in that it's used often enough that most readers 
have seen it before and don't think it's weird; they understand what it's meant 
to convey. It's been around for several years now.
 

 As I say, next time I see it used, I'll give you the link. Then maybe you can 
relax. You're getting yourself all worked up over nothing. The Internet is 
changing how people write, and there ain't a damn thing you can do about it.
 

 You didn't answer my question, BTW, as to why you didn't explode in blind rage 
when Barry has used it.
 
Feste continues to fester:

 > Are you still insisting that "it's pretty much standard practice these days 
 > for bloggers and 
 > commenters when they want to say something emphatically"?  
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 I don't "follow" it because it's a fad. I don't "follow" it at all, actually; 
I very rarely use it. But it really isn't "stupid"--if you think about how it 
would sound if you said it aloud, you may hear an echo of, say, your mother: 
"You. Get. In. Here. Right. Now." It can be an effective way of emphasizing 
something.
 

 Me, I don't think "standards of good writing" on a Web forum (i.e., highly 
informal, conversational) necessarily exclude what would be nonstandard in more 
formal writing if it adds something--flavor, humor, irony, surprise. It can be 
creative and entertaining if well used.
 

 Given your reaction, I'll most likely use the period-after-every-word effect 
more often. It's fun to see your stuffy freakout.
 

 I believe Barry has used it a few times, but that didn't seem to have upset 
you. Double standards, perhaps?
 
Feste huffed:
 
 > Goodness me, just because it's a fad on the Web doesn't mean you have to 
 > follow it. It. Makes. No. Sense. At. All. It's. Stupid.  I thought you were 
 > the sort of person who liked to uphold standards of good, effective writing, 
 > but alas, it appears that I am mistaken. I. Am. Sad. About. That. 
 

 

 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <authfriend@...> wrote:

 Feste tries again:
 > Standard practice? You have got to be kidding.
 

 Uh, no.
 

 > I have never seen it before. I. Think. It. Is. Very. Bad. Writing.
 
 
 LOL. Better learn to appreciate Web-speak for the sake of your blood pressure. 
It's not going anywhere.
 

 > It's quite fun watching you being a punching bag for everyone else and 
 > lamely trying to claim victory.
 
 
 Actually I don't "claim victory." The folks throwing the punches and missing 
(or smacking themselves in the face) are losers without any assistance from me. 
But I'm glad you're enjoying the spectacle.
 

 > As for the testosterone pills, I don't need them. Just ask my girlfriend. 
 
 
Mmmm-hmmm.
 



 
 

 
 







































Reply via email to