Let's get serious.
So, why would anybody care if anyone else is posting from home; or from
their living room; or from their kitchen; or from a cafe in Paris, FR;
or from a Dairy Queen in Paris, TX; or even posting from a parking lot
on a cell phone Walmart in Deadwood, SD?
Now, I can understand why someone might get defensive if anyone found
out they were posting to a chat room from their place of employ; or if
you're charging clients by the hour and posting from your home office
when you should be doing work. That's some serious posting!
But, if you're getting paid by the piece, it should be no problem -
lot's of people are able to multi-task all day and all night and make an
honest living and send posts at all hours.
The problem is posting to a chat room using your professional name as a
handle and including your business email address in order to advertise
your services. That's against the FFL rule about posting spam to the
group. It's even worse if you're using someone else's business name.
That's real serious!
On 12/9/2013 4:20 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
I don't believe for a second, Barry, that you take Richard seriously.
Rather, you take me VERY seriously, and you're continuing to stalk me.
So I really shouldn't accede to your request. But it's so laughably
simple, I will.
(Oh, by the way, you failed Emily's test miserably. You were unable to
hold off stalking me for even two weeks--it's been only four days.)
Here's Richard's original troll:
> Yogi Bhajan says that "Kundalini energy is technically explained as being sparked during
yogic breathing
> when prana and apana blends at the 3rd chakra (naval center) at which point it initially drops
down to the
> 1stand 2nd chakras before traveling up to the spine to the higher centers
of the brain to activate the
> golden cord - the connection between the pituitary and pineal glands
- and penetrate the 7 chakras."
> However, this technique was denigrated by Judy in a somewhat inane
post denying that MMY bijas were
> the nicknames of the Istadevatas. Go figure.
Richard never was able to document his claim that I "denigrated" the
technique he describes. I don't know anything about the technique, had
never heard of it, would have had no reason to "denigrate" it. Nor has
he come up with any documentation that I denied that "MMY bijas were
the nicknames of the Istadevatas." I don't know (as I said in the
quote he keeps posting) what "nicknames" might even mean in this context.
But the bijas are not, as I said in the other quote Richard keeps
posting, the names of the personal gods; they have perfectly good
names of their own (Lakshmi, Saraswati, etc.). Maharishi said in
Beacon Light that the bijas are the "mantras" of personal gods, not
the names of personal gods.
For reference, here are the two quotes from my posts as Richard has
posted them:
"...the TM mantras are *not* the names of the Hindu gods. The Hindu gods
have perfectly good names of their own."
And:
"Richard is lying. I never said anything about 'the technique,'
whatever it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't 'nicknames'
of the deities (whatever 'nicknames' means in this context)."
Any questions? Anybody see any lies or fibs (except from Richard)?
Feeling a little silly, Barry? After all that huffing and puffing?
BTW, Barry, just for the recordI, failing to keep a promise does not
make the promise a lie unless it can be shown that the person who made
it never intended to keep it.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <turquoiseb@...> wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams" wrote:
>
> Let's make this real simple so everyone understands:
>
> NOBODY cares that you're working from home and NOBODY cares if
you're
> posting here in between working for clients and NOBODY cares if
you have
> any clients and NOBODY cares if you post anything or not. NOBODY.
/*I dunno, Richard. I, for one, would love to see her come up with
this "detailed refuation" she's been crowing about for so long.
So, speaking in my capacity as "someone other than Xeno who takes
Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation," I want one.
Failure to produce one will prove Judy a liar, because she made that
very offer just below.
I expect exact quotes, URLs, and citations. Maybe even a bibliography
and footnotes. :-)
*/
> On 12/9/2013 12:51 PM, authfriend@... wrote:
> >
> > This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here
(except
> > Xeno) takes Richard seriously enough to want a detailed
refutation,
> > let me know.
> >
> >
> > Richard wrote:
> >
> > > Maybe Share is waiting to see if you'll explain NOT saying
the bijas
> > are the nicknames of the deities and why you're mixing working
and
> > posting to a discussion group at the same time.
> >
> > On 12/9/2013 11:08 AM, authfriend@ > >
> >> So you've made up your mind to die with the sin of bearing false
> >> witness (one of the Big Ten) on your soul? In your mind, that's
> >> preferable to confessing?
> >>
> >>
> >> (And as you know, "sub specie aeternitatis" has nothing to do
with
> >> scolding, so that's yet more false witness.)
> >>
> >>
> >> Share did her phony innocent lightheartedness act:
> >>
> >> >But Richard, you gotta give Judy points, or something, for
scolding
> >> me in Latin!Google is my new best friend, along with eternity (-:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Monday, December 9, 2013 8:56 AM, Richard J. Williams
> >> punditster@ > >> This message has all the earmarks of you
sitting at your computer in
> >> a home office posting replies whenever the "ding" goes off,
alerting
> >> you that someone posted to FFL.
> >>
> >> So, which is it? Did you say the TM mantras are NOT the names
of the
> >> personal gods; or did you NOT say the bijas weren't
"nicknames" of
> >> the deities? Go figure.
> >>
> >> "Richard is lying. I never said anything about "the technique,"
> >> whatever it is, or was. Nor did I say the bijas weren't
"nicknames"
> >> of the deities (whatever "nicknames" means in this context)."
> >>
> >> From: authfriend
> >> Subject: OMG: madhuauudana & definition of dhaaraNaa
> >> Forum: Yahoo! FairfiedLife
> >> Date: November 25, 2013 2:04 PM
> >>
> >> On 12/9/2013 8:36 AM, authfriend@ > >>
> >>> This is all trolling, stuff Richard made up. If anyone here
takes
> >>> Richard seriously enough to want a detailed refutation, let
me know.
> >>>
> >>> Richard trolled:
> >>>
> >>> > Maybe Share is waiting for you to admit you told a fib
about the
> >>> TM mantras being the names of the Hindu personal gods.
> >>>
> >>> On 12/9/2013 8:03 AM, authfriend@ > >>>
> >>>> Do you think this "last resolve" for you, Share, will include
> >>>> confessing and repenting of the falsehoods you've told on
FFL? Or
> >>>> are you just going to pretend they don't count, pretend
they're
> >>>> only a matter of seeing things differently, and take a chance
> >>>> you'll get away with them sub specie aeternitatis?
> >>>>
> >>>> Share exclaimed:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Wow, Buck, what a great rousing hymn to begin the week
with, thanks for posting.
> >>>>
> >>>>
>
