Do I have to use the "highlighter" again to point out what you *really* think of the people you're preaching to, "Buck?" The only people on this forum who consistently look down on others as much as you do are Nabby and Doctordumbass.
I suggest another way of interpreting your (and those people's) use of jargon. It's to *intentionally* make people feel as if they're your inferiors. That's the way that you keep pretending that you're superior. Just look at what you wrote below, "Buck." You *literally* believe that anyone who doesn't think the way you do is "ignorant," that they "*have* to improve themselves" before they can participate in any discussion with you, that they're "rank beginners," and that above all they *need* self-improvement before they can join your "intelligent conversation" and be one of the "spiritual people." If this is what you consider intelligent, *no wonder* so few people respond to your diatribes. Who would want to discuss anything with an elitist asshole like you? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > That was pretty basic and essential spirituality. Lurking and Listening in at some point ignorant folks just have to step up and improve themselves if they are really wanting to participate further beyond the introductory lecture. It is true in most any discussion and not everyone needs to participate in every open discussion though they can certainly listen and may be even learn something that was undefined for them before and that they had not known before as rank beginners. If you don't know something about something then everything is jargon as you enter in. Get over it. More than hoping to be spoon-fed take some initiative and read the footnotes for your own Self improvement so as to join in further intelligent conversation. In this case, stop being a sophist and actually meditate if you want to know spirituality. It is certainly not up to every spiritual person to do your own homework on this. You are just making stoopid busy-work here for the real spiritual people here otherwise with this semantic stuff of yours. Have a nice day, -Buck > > > ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@ wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: > > > > Turq you were asking here for 'Spiritual' in common words; well yes anything that reveals in experience the absolute bliss consciousness of the transcendent in life. A transcendentalist. That is different from just common dabbling spiritists or ideological religionists, philosophers or just a classroom physicist. Have a nice meditation today, -Buck in the Dome > > The words highlighted in red above are ALL jargon and buzzwords that mean absolutely nothing to the person who has not 1) encountered them before, and/or 2) gives them a different meaning than you do or the TMO does. > > In other words, you're still trying NOT to communicate. Don't you EVER get tired of being such an elitist? >
