---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, <noozguru@...> wrote :

 What inaccurate predictions?  Most people had questions for things that really 
stood out in the chart. Those predictions are easy to see.  Also many people 
just wanted to know why their life went the way it did, not necessarily 
predictions.  I also use a lot of intuition. 
 

 I bet, intuition and randomness, can be mighty impressive, even to the person 
pulling the scam , erm I mean casting the runes. 
 

 It's a point worth remembering about cold-reading, astrology or any sort of 
divination. The practitioner may not be aware of what they are doing. Intuition 
and general knowledge of what people want to hear are behind this, the fiddling 
around with ephemeris is irrelevant. We ought to know that by now.
 

  The chart helps key that and gives direction.  If you tie yourself down to 
much to rules you start making bad predictions.
 

 Exactly, it aint nothing to do with planets or stars or anything astronomical. 
I'm glad we finally got there Bhairitu, it was wearing me out!
 
 
 On 08/06/2014 07:22 PM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   
 How do you account for the inaccurate predictions and how do you and your 
clients rationalize them, also what percentage of your predictions are accurate 
and what % are inaccurate?
 
 

 

 From: "Bhairitu noozguru@... mailto:noozguru@... [FairfieldLife]" 
<FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com> mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 10:18 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why astrology is rubbish.
 
 
   
 Only the ladies from the Playboy Mansion lined up for readings (each your 
heart out).  I did readings just for the fun of it and mainly for people where 
I worked and a few friends and relatives.  Never really wanted to hang out a 
shingle.
 
 On 08/06/2014 02:17 PM, Michael Jackson mjackson74@... mailto:mjackson74@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   
 What I get is that from the horoscopes for people I have done the predictions 
played out.  
 
 
 
 you have to be cherry picking. If 100% of your astrology predictions came 
true, you would be a world famous astrologer with millions of people clamoring 
for your readings. How do you account for the inaccurate predictions and how do 
you and your clients rationalize them, also what percentage of your predictions 
are accurate and what % are inaccurate?
 
 

 From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
 Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2014 3:00 PM
 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Why astrology is rubbish.
 
 
   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 On 08/06/2014 09:25 AM, salyavin808 wrote:

   

 
 
 ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 
 
 But that wasn't my point with SallyAnn (which is what Thunderbird wants to 
rename him).  It was to point out that he lacks the proper credentials or 
scientific depth to discuss the issue properly.  He doesn't appear to know even 
basic astronomy. 
 

 LOL. You'veignored most of what I've said anyway, but do you really think 
there is an issue to discuss? Read it all again, all I want to say is that your 
horoscope looks a bit silly if you put everything where it's supposed to be 
instead of where the software thinks it is. Obviously you don't think about it 
like that, the picture the ancients had was sweet but so inaccurate that they'd 
fall over backwards if they saw what reality was really like. How can it be 
taken seriously if you aren't taking in the extra distances due to orbits going 
behind the sun for instance? The only force known to be infinite in extent is 
gravity and it can't be that, it couldn't be that even if the Earth was the 
centre of the universe. It's all rubbish. It's so obvious to me it hurts. What 
other credentials do I need dear Bhairitu?
 
 
 The only thing we seem to be left with is some other force that ties us in 
with the movements of planets against an arbitrary background but is rubbish at 
making predictions even though it's all supposed to be running like clockwork. 
Would I believe it if I was born two hours later?
 
 What I think we have here is a division between though who fear the idea that 
our lives are predestined and those who celebrate it.  If astrology seems to 
give some clue about destiny fine.  Science may also discover the patterns 
which rule our lives and indeed there are scientists trying to do so.  
Unfortunately there are a lot of people who hide behind the shield of science 
who know little about science.
 

 Science has dismissed astrology many times. These patterns that rule our lives 
should make it easy to make testable predictions but they don't seem to work. 
Far from hiding behind a shield I'm actually thinking of ways to show it does 
work, by having a chart done for instance and then thinking about it. Trouble 
is, one of the main predictions was wrong. So how can any of the others be 
right if they don't take into account the effect that a life changing event 
would have had. Be being extra vague? That doesn't sound like my life is being 
ruled by patterns that science has yet to understand.
 
 
 Do you get it yet?
 



 
 I get that you can't rationally discuss the subject.   What'sirrational about 
anything I've said? 
 Your replies are emotionally biased and loaded with ignorance both of 
astrology and science.  Emotionallybiased? That makes no sense but I admit I'm 
ignorant of how astrology could possibly work.  I'm always happy to apply 
scientific principles to things though, I do now how to do that coz it's easy, 
you just look for the weak link and set up a question that falsifies the 
conjecture if it can't be answered. 
 AndBTW there are practitioners of heliocentric astrology.  Maybe you ought to 
test it out.
 Like I said, there are experts in Bigfoot and Yeti... 
 
 What I get is that from the horoscopes for people I have done the predictions 
played out.   So you are the perfect astrologer? Cool. 
 Put that in your chillum and smoke it. Childish.
 
 
 
 On 08/06/2014 12:39 AM, TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@... mailto:turquoiseb@... 
[FairfieldLife] wrote:

   From: salyavin808 <no_re...@yahoogroups.com> mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com
 
 ---infairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, 
<noozguru@...> mailto:noozguru@... wrote :
 
 And besides, we get it, you don't like astrology. :-D  
 I've yet to see anything to like about it. 
 
 







 As previously noted, I don't think there is any link between the motions of 
the planets and human behavior, *even on the level of long-term observance of 
trends*, using the "motions of the planets" only to map the supposed repeating 
time-trends. I think it's all hooey onto which people project their shit. 
 
 That said, I see no more harm in astrology *used for entertainment purposes*, 
and nothing else. I see it as on pretty much the same level as these silly 
websites that promise to tell you your "personality type" or (recently) your 
"life novel." They're just Rorschach tests, which can be used to explore one's 
own personality, along the lines of, "Wow...I can't believe I see a hot babe in 
that blob of ink. What does that say about me." 
 
 You can potentially have the same level of fun with an astrology reading, 
presuming that you didn't pay very much for it, and don't take it too 
seriously, and as anything *more* or *more meaningful* than entertainment. I 
can still make jokes about my own "Sagittarius tendencies," for example, and 
laugh about the supposedly Sag traits I read about that seem to apply to me, 
but at the same time I know that I'm just projecting any correspondences 
ontothese traits, and that they aren't real. They're just entertaining. 
 
 It's when people start putting money on the line for astrology that things go 
over the line. Paying hundreds of dollars to 

(Message over 64 KB, truncated) 


































Reply via email to