> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > I wish all you anonymice would sign your posts with at > least a nom de net so the rest of us can keep track!
Simply responding to thoughts in themselves is not enough? So you can keep track of periceived inconsistencies and so you can pounce and play "gottcha games". If you percieve inconsistencies among any posts, why not simply ask for clarification? What makes a (perceived) inconsistency from the same poster any more intereresting than one from separate posters? For example earlier today rick said liberation was the realization that there never were boundaries. Jim later, while claiming liberation, said that of course there are boundaries in liberation and anyone who disagrees is insane. So thats an interesting difference between two posts. It would be interesting for each to respond. It seems to me that nothing is added if the two posts are from the same poster. Though maybe rick and jim are the same person, who knows. So, again, what is the value of labeling each anon? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/JjtolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
