--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > In a message dated 8/19/06 5:54:09 P.M. Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > Well, usually so is the Washington Post. > > Yeah, that must have been why they didn't ask about > WARRANTLESS wiretapping. > > <snort> > > > > Judy, something tells me that had the Washington Post specifically mentioned > warrantless wiretapping as a method of receiving suspected terrorist calls > coming into the country and the poll had similar numbers you still wouldn't > accept it. There would have been another excuse as to why the poll was flawed.
If there was a good reason to say it was flawed, sure. But that didn't come up, did it? As it was, it had one HUGE flaw with regard to the issue currently in the courts: It didn't even mention it. > That is why I told Shemp in that one post,I'm not holding my breath. > To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
